Re: [ga] Notice to Jeff Williams Re: GA list archives problems?

[<chris@xxxxxx>]

Thanks for the encouragement Thomas. Your positive input is always so welcome.

Chris McElroy

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Thomas Baxter 
  To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 5:54 PM
  Subject: Re: [ga] Notice to Jeff Williams Re: GA list archives problems?


  TLDA has to talk on this list - they have to borrow lists from other 
orgnization
  since their crappy brittish list provider server is crashed. 

  lists.tldainc.org/public - connection refuses.  For more than 4 days now.

  Whats new?

  I repeat - therte is not compitent representation for tld holders at all 
enywhere. ICANN does a 
  better job. 

  Sorry, the truth hurts sometimes.

  Thoms


  ----- Original Message ----
  From: Tom Evans <fromtomevans@xxxxxxxxx>
  To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 11:55:45 AM
  Subject: Re: [ga] Notice to Jeff Williams Re: GA list archives problems?

  sigh, i thought this would be a hotly debated TLDA discussion, what's with 
  the public flogging "he's so naughty" bottleneck???


  On 4/14/08, David Scott <tlda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Apologizes Dominik, I hit reply instead of reply-all.

    I am wondering if a formal warning on the list should be issue, so that 
everyone gets the warning, and further that the suspension be set in effect 
starting the next posting day.

    What exactly is the rule of exceeding the posting limit. Or where is it 
documented that what the repercussions of exceeding the posing limit is.

    On another note, why are we limited to only 5 post, I understand that on 
any given topic of discussion that if it is deemed a "hot" topic the limit then 
should be more then 5, as it seems almost a waste of thought, to have to wait 
another day to continue a discussion.

    That's just my 2 cents...

    David Scott
    UCANN2