[ga] Re: [At-Large] Registrars exploit the lack of ICANN contractenforcement

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John and all,

  My answers interspersed below.

John Levine wrote:

> > Why isn't this a violation of RAA 3.7.4:
>
> Of course it's a violation, just like NSI's front running.
>
> My questions:
>
> a) What process does ICANN have to audit registrar compliance with the
> RAA?

  Obviously none or it's not working.

>
>
> b) Once egregious violations of the RAA is brought to ICANN's attention,
> what process does ICANN have to correct them?

Kindly ask them to cease and desist?  Offer them a cookie if they
will cease such lack of oversight or errant activity?

>
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for 
> Dummies",
> Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
> "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
>

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827