Re: [ga] ICANN - USG JPA Mid term review

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

JFC and all,

  In order for "Consensus" to be determined, I believe it would
be necessary to know what Ed's or anyone elses opinion is.  Ergo
JFC, his question and stated concern is a valid one.

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827

JFC Morfin wrote:

> At 10:01 03/02/2008, Edward Hasbrouck wrote:
> >On 2 Feb 2008 at 20:05, "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> ><GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> > > Show your support
> > > http://www.icann.org/jpa/comment-letter.html
> >
> >I don't see anywhere on the ICANN Web site to indicate my opinion "yes" or
> >"no" on any of the points in the sample comment letter, or to send a
> >letter expressing the opposite opinion.
> >This looks like a poll in which you can only vote "yes".
> >Is ICANN trying to stuff NTIA's ballot box?
>
> I am afraid you forget that the ICANN community proceeds by consensus.
> jfc