Re: [ga] .et wildcarded

[JFC Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 13:15 22/11/2007, Ross Rader wrote:
> On 21-Nov-07, at 11:19 AM, Joe Baptista wrote:
> > The ICANN / IANA root zone is under significant stress when it comes
> > to error traffic.
> When I hear that from the ICANN/IANA root operators, or at least
> someone close to the community, I'll start to worry about the root
> zone error traffic.
Dear Ross,
May I suggest that you have a look at NFS http://geni.net. You may 
find some interesting readings there, at very understandable level. I 
do not agree with their ultimate target (an urgent new Internet, ITU 
layers only) but I do acknowledge their unique expertise. You may 
want to read the Case in Page 5 of the GENI Research  Plan. Joe is 
obviously very conservative, as all those who never engaged into 
running a real life test-bed as requested by ICANN ICP-3. IETF 
refused. I did on a limited community scale. GENI is engaging in a 
drastic test-bed. I am now preparing a "stata above" similar test.
BTW I have a difficulty with your post: what do mean by "community". 
Who are those close of it you trust? Why are they not member of it? 
Would you mean the who's RFC 3774 calls the "affinity group" and RFC 
3935 calls the "leaders". It would make sense in your perspective 
that they would be the 
http://www.iana.org/assignments/special-registry ones and those who 
strive to close in? But are you not afraid that these pantheon's 
people will only give you a later than an early warning?
Take care.
jfc