<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] .et wildcarded
- To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] .et wildcarded
- From: "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:11:46 -0500
Hi JFC,
Billions of dollars have been collectively spent by businesses to promote
their current domain names. What makes you think that any significant number
of these businesses would abandon their past efforts and switch to an
unproven alternative?
Sincerely,
Ted
Prophet Partners Inc.
http://www.ProphetPartners.com
http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "JFC Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] .et wildcarded
At 21:35 19/11/2007, Peter Dambier wrote:
Sounds like ".local" has become more prominent than ".com".
Root-servers report they receive 50 times as much traffic.
Well, I run my own private, little rootserver.
It is meant for internal use only but I do receive traffic
allthough I am on a dynamic ip-address.
Unfortunately you are not under windows. The first one who develops an
adequate private root server under windows will kill the domain name
business which stubbornly does not want to undestand the way it will move.
It will then be interesting.
jfc
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|