<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Draft Anti-Phishing Best Practices Recommendations for Registrars
- To: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Draft Anti-Phishing Best Practices Recommendations for Registrars
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Ross,
No matter what the community asks for, if the
registrars have to spend a dime they will invariably
oppose the request.
PS looking forward to seeing the registrar response to
domain tasting :)
--- Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 25-Oct-07, at 8:20 AM, Danny Younger wrote:
>
> > My first estimation: As many of the
> recommendations
> > will require either work or investment on the part
> of
> > the registrars, these "best practice"
> recommendations
> > will not be broadly adopted.
>
>
> Wow. This is a productive analysis - in which you
> make it completely
> unclear whether you just have a poor command of the
> facts or just
> like the sound of your "voice".
>
> Two small bits;
>
> a) most registrars are already closely working with
> anti-crime
> interests to ensure that real criminal damage is
> prevented or
> minimized in a very real way on a day to day basis.
>
> b) much of what is in this report seems to be so
> thoroughly entangled
> in civil and intellectual property matters that the
> community really
> doesn't want registrars acting as judge, jury and
> executioner in the
> ways described in this paper.
>
> -ross
>
> "To solve the problems of today, we must focus on
> tomorrow."
> - Erik Nupponen
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|