<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Australian geographic domain names released
- To: ga DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Australian geographic domain names released
- From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:38:06 -0500
On Oct 21, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Karl Auerbach wrote:
Andy Gardner wrote:
I hand-typed djacobson.com into a browser, and I got a godaddy
parking page. How the hell do registrars get away with this sort
of thing?
To DNS www.foo.tld and foo.tld are entirely different names with
different resource record sets.
It was suggested that one ought to use dns wildcards. I don't.
It's too much of a blunderbuss approach for my liking.
I sometimes use CNAME records to map all of the names I want a
given web server to be visible under and then use the ServerAlias
configuration to tell Apache to accept all of those.
For purposes of search engine results I've been told that it is
even better to set up actual name-based virtual servers for each of
those names and have them do 301 permanent redirects to the desired
name. This is not quite as easy as the ServerAlias configuration of
Apache, but its not that much harder once you've learned how to set
up virtual hosts. (That's Apache virtual hosts, not virtual
machines a la VMware or Xen.)
Agree absolutely!
But in this case the REGISTRAR is making use of unallocated resources
and making cash from it, possibly without the Registrants knowledge.
Does the Registrar Constituency have a code of ethics?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|