ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Fw: ICANN Bod independant review?

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] Fw: ICANN Bod independant review?
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 01:49:50 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

All,

FYI

-----Forwarded Message-----
>From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Oct 14, 2007 1:33 AM
>To: board-review-tor@xxxxxxxxx
>Cc: avri@xxxxxxx, gnso-liaison@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: ICANN Bod independant review?
>
>All participants,
>
>  From: http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-20sep07.htm
>
>  My question is how can the ICANN board be reviewed
>independantly by the GNSO, and additionally said review
>is under the "guidance from the Board on each reviews terms 
>of reference" and be considered a ligitimate independant review?
>This seems very much like a oxy moron.
>
>=======
>
>'Regards,
>Jeffrey A. Williams
>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>   Abraham Lincoln
>
>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
>United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
>===============================================================
>Updated 1/26/04
>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
>Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>