Re: [ga] Registry Constituency Statement on WHOIS

[jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Danny and all,

  This is still not good enough by a significant margin.  Why?
Well it's very simnple really, it gives the IPC or IP lobbies
and thier cronies the MPAA and RIAA to make any claim of a
IP dispute as a pretext to getting any registrants personal
and private data wheather or not there actually is a ligitimate
IP claimed dispute.  Sorry no cigar here, just another IPC/BC
canard in a vailed attempt to appear considerate of registrants.

-----Original Message-----
>From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Oct 8, 2007 1:18 PM
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ga] Registry Constituency Statement on WHOIS
>
>
>[excerpt]
>
>RyC believes that a decent respect for registrants’
>interests in protection of personal privacy demands a
>change in the type of data published in the WHOIS
>service. There is, of course, a difference between the
>types of data collected by registrars, and the types
>of data published in the WHOIS service. RyC generally
>supports the concepts underlying the Registrar
>Constituency’s OPoC proposal (although there are some
>practical concerns addressed below). Registrars have
>their own business needs for collection of registrant
>data, and should be able to make decisions primarily
>based on these needs and on the legal requirements of
>the jurisdictions where they operate.
>
>RyC strongly believes that there is no acceptable
>reason for publication of an individual’s personal
>data such as home address, phone number or email
>address, whether by a registry or registrar unless
>that individual freely and explicitly gives consent to
>such publication. To the extent that such data is
>needed for law enforcement purposes or for the
>resolution of conflicts such as intellectual property,
>the appropriate means to meet these needs should be a
>tiered access process. RyC acknowledges that a tiered
>access model presents some policy implementation
>challenges but believes that it would be very
>worthwhile to confront those challenges in a
>constructive and diligent manner.
>
>Complete statement at http://www.gtldregistries.org/news/2007/2007-10-04-01.pdf
>
>
>       

=======

'Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx