Re: [dow3tf] Registrar amendments to IPC draft
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 19/10/2004 4:13 PM Ross Wm. Rader noted that; | On 19/10/2004 3:55 PM Brian Darville noted that; | | Ross: | | | | You should not assume acceptance from silence. The IPC views the | changes as greatly diminishing any meaningful progress on data accuracy | so I don't think many members of the IPC view your proposed changes as | progress. We can discuss this further on the call tomorrow. | | | Are there any specifics that we could cover in advance? We don't seem to | be making much progress discussing these proposals 40 minutes at a time | every seven days. We might be able to cover more if we relied more | heavily on the mailing list and other resources at our disposal.
Although my preference would have been to start drawing out details supporting this contention prior to the call, it appears that this is not going to happen. Given a definite need to deal with the substance of the amended IPC proposal in the context of the existing policy, I have drawn up a quick comparative analysis of the existing policy and amended IPC proposal (attached). This document clearly outlines where the existing policy leaves off, where the amended IPC proposal extends the current policies and precisely where the amended IPC proposal makes progress towards the goal of whois data accuracy is being made.
In light of this analysis, I would like to hear specifically from the IPC regarding how the changes to IPC proposal are "greatly diminishing any meaningful progress on data accuracy" on the call today.
It is my view that the IPC contention is rhetorical and not factual and unless the IPC illustrates otherwise, I would like to request that the TF move forward with crafting final policy recommendations based on the amended IPC proposal and forward them to the Council as soon as is practicable for further action.
Thank you in advance for your consideration, - --
iD8DBQFBdmwF6sL06XjirooRAmxoAJ45RKTf3RsftJaRdnph2UwjgsHp/QCeJcrG hU6Wey/iZ6tym0UZFh+O/Rg= =90De -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----