<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[dow3tf] Draft minutes/notes WHOIS task force 3, January 7, 2004
- To: "3DOW3tf" <dow3tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [dow3tf] Draft minutes/notes WHOIS task force 3, January 7, 2004
- From: "GNSO SECRETARIAT" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:12:31 +0100
- Importance: Normal
- Reply-to: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-dow3tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[To: dow3tf[at]gnso.icann.org]
Please find attached the draft minutes/notes of the WHOIS task force 3 call
on January 7, 2004.
Please let me know if you would like any changes made.
Thank you,
Glen
GNSO secretariat
<!--#set var="bartitle" value="WHOIS Task Force 3 minutes"-->
<!--#set var="pagetitle" value="WHOIS Task Force 3 minutes"-->
<!--#set var="7 January 2004" value=""-->
<!--#set var="bgcell" value="#ffffff"-->
<!--#include virtual="/header.shtml"-->
<!--#exec cmd="/usr/bin/perl /etc/gnso/menu.pl 'WHOIS Task Force 3 minutes'"-->
<p align="center"><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>WHOIS Task Force
3 Teleconference January 7, 2004 - Minutes</b></font></p>
<p><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">ATTENDEES:<br>
</font></b></p>
<p><b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">GNSO Constituency representatives:<br>
</font></b><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Intellectual Property
Interests Constituency - Brian Darville - Chair:<br>
Registrars Constituency - Ross Rader<br>
Commercial and Business Users constituency - Sarah Deutsch<br>
Internet Service Providers and connectivity providers Constituency</font> -
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Greg Ruth</font><br>
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">gTLD Registries constituency: - Ken
Stubbs </font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> <br>
<br>
<br>
<b>ICANN Staff Manager</b>: Barbara Roseman<br>
</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>GNSO Secretariat:</b> Glen
de Saint Géry <br>
<br>
<b>Absent: </b></font><br>
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
liaisons: Vittorio Bertola<br>
Non Commercial Users constituency - Frannie Wellings<br>
Intellectual Property Interests Constituency - Kiyoshi Tsuru<br>
At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) liaisons: - Vittorio Bertola<br>
Intellectual Property Interests Constituency - Terry Clark <br>
<br>
Brian Darville proposed the following agenda:</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1. Registrar questionnaire on data
verification practices<br>
2. Survey of other industries on their data verification practices<br>
a. <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00017.html">Sarah
Deutsch's list</a><br>
b. Terry Clark"s <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00023.html">list
of Registrars and ccTLDs</a><br>
3. Questions to ccTLDs<br>
4. Schedule <br>
5. MP3 recordings:<br>
<br>
<b>Item 1. Registrar questionnaire on data verification practices</b><br>
<b>Ross Rader </b>gave some background to the term "Registrars". There
were two groups of Registrars:<br>
1. 180 Registrars accredited by ICANN<br>
2. A smaller group of about 50/60 who were members of the GNSO Registrar's constituency<br>
<br>
The survey was focussed on the second group. It was unclear whether the registrars
were doing anything on verification up front.<br>
Few responses had been received, but Ken Stubbs emphasized the importance of
the outreach that was undertaken.<br>
<b>Ross Rader</b> reported that Friday 16 January was the return date for the
request made to the registrars. Where the respondents allowed information to
be shared, it would be made available to the task force and where the respondents
wished to remain anonymous, the information would be summarized.<br>
The report should include:<br>
1. Current practices among registrars/background<br>
2. The group that was investigated<br>
3. Questions that were asked<br>
4. Responses received<br>
5. Identifying the respondents or not<br>
<br>
<b>Report deadline : 19 January, 2004</b><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Item 2. Survey of other industries
on their data verification practices</b><br>
a. <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00017.html">Sarah
Deutsch's list</a><br>
b. Terry Clark"s <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow3tf/msg00023.html">list
of Registrars and ccTLDs</a><br>
<b>Brian Darville</b> referred to the two lists of Registrars and ccTLDs that
had been circulated by Terry Clark and Sarah Deutsch.<br>
The purpose was to provide a best practice document of data verification by
going to outside sources to see what was involved in the techniques used for
the data verification processes and whether their practices could be applied
to the ICANN process. <br>
Questions arose as to the number of outside sources that should be investigated,
and the manner in which information would be obtained.<br>
It was suggested that 5 industries and 3 companies in each of the industries
should be identified with the chief players.<br>
<br>
It was mentioned that there was nothing specifically spelt out on data verification
in the IETF survey.<br>
Data collection should be undertaken on an individual contact base from task
force members as well as through constituency representatives.<br>
<b>Ken Stubbs</b> suggested that looking at prepaid services was a good way
of getting information and added that the different approaches to WHOIS should
be taken into account.<br>
<br>
<b>Sarah Deutsch</b> would draw up a short questionnaire to be used in speaking
to the industries. <br>
Questions could include:<br>
a. at what stage do they do data verification?<br>
b. what non propriety material is available?<br>
c. costs involved<br>
<b>Brian Darville</b> would circulate a list of 5 industries and companies by
Friday 9 January, 2004.<br>
<br>
<br>
<b>Item 3. Gathering information from the ccTLDs</b><br>
<b>Brian Darville</b> referred to <a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg00350.html">Elisabeth
Porteneuve's letter</a> and suggested that questions for a survey to sent to
the ccTLDS.<br>
<b>Barbara Roseman</b> mentioned the questions that the task force 2 were preparing
and suggested sending the questions to the task force 3.<br>
<br>
<b>Item 5. MP3 recordings</b></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Barbara Roseman</b> informed the
participants that MP3 recordings were made of each call but that it was up to
the task force to decide whether the recordings should be published on the website
and kept or deleted after the minutes were written.<br>
<b>Brian Darville</b> suggested voting via the mailing list on whether MP3 recordings
should be retained, and if so, whether they should be published on the website.<br>
<b>Ross Rader</b> was in favour of retaining the MP3 recordings and publishing
them as part of the record.<br>
The GNSO Secretariat would contact the chairs of the other task forces and send
out a short e-mail survey to all the WHOIS task force members.<br>
<br>
<b>Next call:</b></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1. Finalize questionnaire<br>
2. Task different people (including constituency representatives) with contacting
and gathering information from the identified sources. <br>
3. Registrar information available by Monday 19, January.<br>
4. ccTLD questions<br>
</font><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br>
<b>Brian Darville thanked everyone for their presence and participation and
ended the call at 16:55 UTC.<br>
<br>
</b> <b>Next call: Wednesday 14 January</b> <b>15:00 UTC, 10:00 EST, 7:00 Los
Angeles, 16:00 CET.<br>
<br>
<br>
</b></font></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|