ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[dow2tf]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [dow2tf] NCUC Vote

  • To: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [dow2tf] NCUC Vote
  • From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 20:26:41 +0200
  • Cc: dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mueller@xxxxxxx, marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <126.4211bdde.2de8c130@aol.com>
  • Mail-followup-to: KathrynKL@xxxxxxx, dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mueller@xxxxxxx, marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <126.4211bdde.2de8c130@aol.com>
  • Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
On 2004-05-28 12:22:08 -0400, Kathryn Kleiman wrote:

> The Noncommercial Users??? Constituency approves the preliminary
> TF2 report and supports its publication in full to the public for
> comment.  We note the following concerns and reservations
> regarding Section 3.5 and throughout the report, to be recorded
> with our vote:

While it seems like we don't get to vote on the report, ALAC would
still like to advise the task force that we support publication of
the full report, too.

> The Noncommercial Users??? Constituency approves of the concept
> of a Tiered Access With Balance, in which the rights of the data
> subjects (domain name holders) are clearly balanced with the
> rights of the data recipients (e.g., intellectual property
> owners).  In doing so, we submit that there must be a clear 
> distinction of sensitive and non-sensitive data, that domain name
> holders must receive immediate notification when data is released
> (in most cases), and that the system must avoid any White List
> (unlimited access to certain parties merely because they are
> known users).  

ALAC agrees with these points, too.

-- 
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>