ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

TR: [dow2tf] Vote

  • To: "2DOW2tf" <dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: TR: [dow2tf] Vote
  • From: "GNSO SECRETARIAT" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 20:30:32 +0200
  • Importance: Normal
  • Reply-to: <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Posted on behalf of Magnolia Mansourkia 
Envoye : vendredi 28 mai 2004 14:18
A : gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : FW: [dow2tf] Vote

Since my server and this list have not been able to connect for some reason
in the past, I'm forwarding the below to you, so that you may post it on my
behalf to make sure the ISPCP vote is received and recorded.

Thanks and have a great weekend.


The ISPCP hereby votes to move this Interim Report to be released for the
Public Comment Phase.  The ISPCP would like to thank all members of TF2 for
their respective contributions, hard work and impassioned advocacy which
lead to the creation of this report and discussions which preceded it.
Special thanks and praise goes to the Chair of our task force for his
evenhanded approach, leadership and hard work.  Many thanks also go to
ICANN staff, especially the GNSO Secretariat for support and time dedicated
to the work of this task force.

Magnolia Mansourkia

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 3:55 PM
To: Steve Metalitz
Cc: 2DOW2tf
Subject: Re: [dow2tf] Vote

Okay, I found Kathy's document describing the edits to 3.5, and I think 
the elimination of point (f) is the only remaining one.  I've reflected 

Please find attached NEW documents--one that is a redline relative to 
Tuesday's draft; one is a clean Word document; and one is a clean PDF 

Since no one's voted yet, votes will apply to THIS version of the 


Attachment: TF 2 Initial Report d0527.doc
Description: application/applefile

Attachment: TF 2 Initial Report d0527.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: TF2 Initial Report.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Attachment: TF2 Initial Report.doc
Description: application/applefile

Attachment: TF2 Initial Report.doc
Description: MS-Word document

On May 27, 2004, at 3:08 PM, Steve Metalitz wrote:

> Jordyn, I hate to have to point this out, but the text of section 3.5
> still does not fully reflect the text Kathy and I agreed to over the
> weekend, which is attached to
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow2tf/msg00296.html.  In
> particular, point (f) of the list of principles should be eliminated.  
> I
> have looked quickly through the document (not the appendices!) and have
> not caught any other errors.
> Steve Metalitz
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jordyn A. Buchanan
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 2:44 PM
> To: 2DOW2tf
> Subject: [dow2tf] Vote
> Hello all:
> I'm hoping that the lack of activity on the list this morning means 
> that
> we've resolved all issues with the report and are ready to vote on it.
> Since it's due tomorrow, that's good timing.
> Please find attached Word and PDF versions of the proposed Initial
> Report.  The only remaining modification will be to record the vote of
> the task force after we vote.
> Because I have not yet received definitive information about voting
> procedures from the Council or General Counsel, I will ask that the
> primary representative from each constituency, the primary
> representative from the ALAC, and our NomCom-appointed Council rep
> (Amadeu) all cast votes.  I will record the votes in the voting section
> of the report and allow the council to interpret the decision according
> to the bylaws.
> I think we've worked out a good, balanced report with recommendations
> that are fair compromises, so I'm hoping that people will be able to
> vote to support the entire report.  This will allow us to have a much
> cleaner and easier to explain view of the report.  If for some reason
> you cannot support the report, you have the option to vote for each
> recommendation that we make in section 3 individually.
> Please cast your votes on each of the following:
> (1) Do you approve that the report in its entirety, including all of 
> its
> recommendations?
> [If you vote "Yes" to #1, you do not need to vote for #2 - #5.]
> (2) Do you approve the recommendations in Section 3.1 of the report?
> (3) Do you approve the recommendations in Section 3.2 of the report?
> (4) Do you approve the recommendations in Section 3.3 of the report?
> (5) Do you approve the recommendations in Section 3.5 of the report?
> Please send votes to both Glen and myself so we can make sure they get
> recorded correctly.  All votes are due by 3 PM EDT tomorrow, but I
> encourage everyone to vote today if possible.
> Jordyn

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>