Re: [dow2tf] Proposed recommendation 3.1

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not sure if this belongs into the inital report or not but there
are some areas which these recommendations do not touch on but which
are directly related to them. I would like to propose that we at least
point them out as areas of further discussion. The issues I'm referring
to are:

1.) what exactly must the registrant give his consent to?
2.) what happens if the registrant does not consent to the display of
    certain parts of his data?
3.) what happens if the registrant does not consent to certain methods
    of display of his data?
4.) what happens if the registrant does not consent at all?
5.) what happens if the registrant withdraws its consent.

Best,

tom

Am 17.05.2004 schrieb Steve Metalitz:
> Here is the proposal for recommendation 3.1 (to accompany the section
> 2.1 findings drafted by Maggie) as originally posted April 22 (see
> http://www.gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow2tf/msg00205.html).
> I don't believe there have been any changes to this but if so I
> apologize.  
> 
> Steve
> 
> 1.  ICANN should: 
> (a) incorporate compliance with the notification and consent requirement
> (R.A.A. Secs. 3.7.7.4, 3.7.7.5) as part of its overall plan to improve
> registrar compliance with the RAA.  (See MOU Amendment II.C.14.d). 
> (b) issue an advisory reminding registrars of the importance of
> compliance
> with this contractual requirement, even registrars operating primarily
> in
> countries in which local law apparently does not require registrant
> consent
> to be obtained.
> (c)  encourage development of best practices that will improve the
> effectiveness of giving notice to, and obtaining consent from, domain
> name
> registrants with regard to uses of registrant contact data, such as by
> requesting that GNSO commence a policy development process (or other
> procedure) with goal of developing such best practices.  
>   
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Barbara Roseman
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 2:59 PM
> To: dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [dow2tf] Gen'l Counsel interpretation of Consensus Policy from
> 2002
> 
> http://www.icann.org/legal/briefing-on-implementation-20oct02.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\	A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w