RE: [dow2tf] Proposed recommendation 3.1

["Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxx>]

Here is the proposal for recommendation 3.1 (to accompany the section
2.1 findings drafted by Maggie) as originally posted April 22 (see
http://www.gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/dow2tf/msg00205.html).
I don't believe there have been any changes to this but if so I
apologize.  

Steve

1.  ICANN should: 
(a) incorporate compliance with the notification and consent requirement
(R.A.A. Secs. 3.7.7.4, 3.7.7.5) as part of its overall plan to improve
registrar compliance with the RAA.  (See MOU Amendment II.C.14.d). 
(b) issue an advisory reminding registrars of the importance of
compliance
with this contractual requirement, even registrars operating primarily
in
countries in which local law apparently does not require registrant
consent
to be obtained.
(c)  encourage development of best practices that will improve the
effectiveness of giving notice to, and obtaining consent from, domain
name
registrants with regard to uses of registrant contact data, such as by
requesting that GNSO commence a policy development process (or other
procedure) with goal of developing such best practices.  
  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Barbara Roseman
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 2:59 PM
To: dow2tf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dow2tf] Gen'l Counsel interpretation of Consensus Policy from
2002

http://www.icann.org/legal/briefing-on-implementation-20oct02.htm