[council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN

[Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree these are friendly amendments.

Thanks,
Darcy


On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:41 AM, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Yes, it is.
>
> Thanks and best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
> *From:* Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:28 PM
> *To:* WUKnoben ; Darcy Southwell ; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as
> a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss
> Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
>
>
> Wolf-Ulrich, please find revised version attached incorporating your
> suggestions. Can you confirm that this is what you had in mind?
>
>
>
> Following that, Darcy, could you confirm whether you consider these
> amendments friendly?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *From: *<owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of WUKnoben <
> wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Reply-To: *WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Date: *Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 3:02 AM
> *To: *Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: *[council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a
> Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss
> Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
>
>
>
> Thanks Darcy,
>
>
>
> as the GNSO (not the GNSO council) is one of the chartering organizations
> I’d like to ask staff to make the motion consistent with this fact, in
> particular the Wheras e. to g. and Res. a.
>
> This would imply that the potential withdrawal was appropriately discussed
> within the community.
>
> I suppose this being friendly amendments.
>
>
>
> As I understand the motion the approval would mean that
>
> - GNSO members could continue on their own to participate in the CWG-IG
>
> - there would be no longer a co-chair from the GNSO
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>
> *From:* Darcy Southwell
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 27, 2016 5:26 AM
>
> *To:* council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering
> Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet
> governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
>
>
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
>
>
> Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering Organization
> for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance
> (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council meeting.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Darcy
>
> __________
>
> *Darcy Southwell *| Compliance Officer
>
> M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
>
>