ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN

  • To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:58:01 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <0051FBF50C84408DB62F8DB57498E541@WUKPC>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <BC65D28A-8282-4A10-A10A-D26CBD50D8BF@endurance.com> <0051FBF50C84408DB62F8DB57498E541@WUKPC>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHSNO+Z/Z4Z0HGg80qp26YKWHN9Bw==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010

Wolf-Ulrich, please find revised version attached incorporating your 
suggestions. Can you confirm that this is what you had in mind?

Following that, Darcy, could you confirm whether you consider these amendments 
friendly?

Best regards,

Marika

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 3:02 AM
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a 
Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss 
Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN

Thanks Darcy,

as the GNSO (not the GNSO council) is one of the chartering organizations I’d 
like to ask staff to make the motion consistent with this fact, in particular 
the Wheras e. to g. and Res. a.
This would imply that the potential withdrawal was appropriately discussed 
within the community.
I suppose this being friendly amendments.

As I understand the motion the approval would mean that
- GNSO members could continue on their own to participate in the CWG-IG
- there would be no longer a co-chair from the GNSO

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

From: Darcy Southwell
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 5:26 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization 
for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) 
issues affecting ICANN

Dear Councilors,

Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering Organization for 
the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) 
issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council meeting.

Best,
Darcy
__________
Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
[https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/tjCmzaF_7ZGN1PtB2KAV5OVQn-Q_Xvh_p3zhRf5gB5-ISEZOkC_6lvGj1xU-T1CFq2ojDyg9cW5rg41SN5rxGkY=s0-d-e1-ft#http://endurance.com/img/nav/logo_large.png]

Attachment: Motion - CWG-IG withdrawal as a chartering organization - updated.docx
Description: Motion - CWG-IG withdrawal as a chartering organization - updated.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>