<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
- To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
- From: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:11:50 +0530
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <63D8DF5A-C02D-4782-B0C2-D35C4956C18F@icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <BC65D28A-8282-4A10-A10A-D26CBD50D8BF@endurance.com> <0051FBF50C84408DB62F8DB57498E541@WUKPC> <63D8DF5A-C02D-4782-B0C2-D35C4956C18F@icann.org>
- Reply-to: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, it is.
Thanks and best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:28 PM
To: WUKnoben ; Darcy Southwell ; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a
Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss
Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
Wolf-Ulrich, please find revised version attached incorporating your
suggestions. Can you confirm that this is what you had in mind?
Following that, Darcy, could you confirm whether you consider these amendments
friendly?
Best regards,
Marika
From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of WUKnoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 3:02 AM
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a
Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss
Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
Thanks Darcy,
as the GNSO (not the GNSO council) is one of the chartering organizations I’d
like to ask staff to make the motion consistent with this fact, in particular
the Wheras e. to g. and Res. a.
This would imply that the potential withdrawal was appropriately discussed
within the community.
I suppose this being friendly amendments.
As I understand the motion the approval would mean that
- GNSO members could continue on their own to participate in the CWG-IG
- there would be no longer a co-chair from the GNSO
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: Darcy Southwell
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 5:26 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization
for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG)
issues affecting ICANN
Dear Councilors,
Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering Organization for
the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG)
issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council meeting.
Best,
Darcy
__________
Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|