ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN

  • To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
  • From: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:11:50 +0530
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <63D8DF5A-C02D-4782-B0C2-D35C4956C18F@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <BC65D28A-8282-4A10-A10A-D26CBD50D8BF@endurance.com> <0051FBF50C84408DB62F8DB57498E541@WUKPC> <63D8DF5A-C02D-4782-B0C2-D35C4956C18F@icann.org>
  • Reply-to: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Yes, it is.

Thanks and best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Marika Konings 
Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 3:28 PM
To: WUKnoben ; Darcy Southwell ; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a 
Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss 
Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN

Wolf-Ulrich, please find revised version attached incorporating your 
suggestions. Can you confirm that this is what you had in mind?

 

Following that, Darcy, could you confirm whether you consider these amendments 
friendly?

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 3:02 AM
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a 
Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss 
Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN 

 

Thanks Darcy,

 

as the GNSO (not the GNSO council) is one of the chartering organizations I’d 
like to ask staff to make the motion consistent with this fact, in particular 
the Wheras e. to g. and Res. a.

This would imply that the potential withdrawal was appropriately discussed 
within the community.

I suppose this being friendly amendments.

 

As I understand the motion the approval would mean that

- GNSO members could continue on their own to participate in the CWG-IG

- there would be no longer a co-chair from the GNSO


Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 

From: Darcy Southwell 

Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 5:26 AM

To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Subject: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization 
for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) 
issues affecting ICANN 

 

Dear Councilors,

 

Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering Organization for 
the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) 
issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council meeting.

 

Best,

Darcy

__________

Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer

M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>