<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal
- To: Paul McGrady <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bruce Tonkin'" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal
- From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:45:40 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neustar.biz; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=neustar-biz; bh=AfH5Vma/4xxGan2idweTa37Rby78a2NZi1MMKObkA0s=; b=XZqmse8VySHM85H/fvPRkloHj/JqubP1LzOnoD/Cls3r3wGI0LgAN2kRO8T+73ET/uUQ 2Lsc2QQTqcpT6z0M+4sHaLJY5VDgVt2VV3gh633VlCI9Ly+ZBfkuPg9wLC8UYLiU6fkX Our/ObSp0B44lMlS9cCq/wLvXmklVY+aHpK0KaS+kSATOnFIuWLHAvtAssMVKiMmiGTK 2m6zHHxvOW0xgnSkJTDdFvmmAduRpisyynTuJKzp0gEXjWs2TOJ4JdGIDYdhoh53FC8/ qrdOguulUG3jBETACcqOSVazH0IKj3C1WwXeqi3AQfPuo8b47IZKpNavsjFisCSIO7kz ZA==
- In-reply-to: <002401d2249f$472a7310$d57f5930$@paulmcgrady.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <F00E4D21-2FAB-4341-8AFF-48E9A52F7411@icann.org> <089001d22431$8e808330$ab818990$@paulmcgrady.com> <263EE96C7DADD44CB3D5A07DBD41D0E8BC9580C8@bne3-0001mitmbx.corp.mit> <002401d2249f$472a7310$d57f5930$@paulmcgrady.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHSI4RnfYLKmlnbc0OuJeKOpW+x7qCkXx+AgACEH4CAAFdTAP//3o8Q
- Thread-topic: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal
Hi Paul
Just to be clear. Mason and I attended a meeting of the group in Helsinki and
we also had a follow-up conversation with Chris in Helsinki. We reported back
to the Council during our wrap-up session in Helsinki.
Mason and I also had a conversation with Chris on the topic in early August,
but not as Council representatives. As you may recall from previous Council
discussions on this issue, the temporary reservation of IGO acronyms in the
Registry Agreement and the inability of a mechanism to release those acronyms
is an issue for registry operators and as such we have an interest in the
matter.
With the exception of meeting in Helsinki, we have not attended any other
meetings of the "small group".
Donna
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Paul McGrady
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:43 AM
To: 'Bruce Tonkin' <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO
policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal
Thank you Bruce. Sounds like an august group. Glad to hear that Mason and
Donna were involved from on the GNSO side and that WIPO was at the table as
well.
Best,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:30 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO
policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal
Hello Paul,
>> Also, apologies if this has been asked & answered, but I didn’t see a list
>> of participants in the “small group” that the Board references. Do we know
>> who those members are?
The group was formed in October 2014.
I don’t have names of individuals but it seems to have consisted of:
- representatives from the IGO coalition that first raised the issue and who
participate in the GAC as observers (including the OECD, WIPO and the UN);
- the GAC Chair,
- and Board representatives from the new gTLD program committee that was in
place at the time this issue came to light (primarily Chris Disspain).
I gather a few others attended some of the meetings as well - e.g. Donna
Austin and Mason Cole.
The group is not decisional - just an ad-hoc group formed to see if they could
come up with a proposal that they thought would be acceptable to the GNSO.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|