RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal

["Paul McGrady" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Bruce.  Sounds like an august group.  Glad to hear that Mason and 
Donna were involved from on the GNSO side and that WIPO was at the table as 
well.


Best,
Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 5:30 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO 
policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal


Hello Paul,

>>  Also, apologies if this has been asked & answered, but I didn’t see a list 
>> of participants in the “small group” that the Board references.  Do we know 
>> who those members are?

The group was formed in October 2014.


I don’t have names of individuals but it seems to have consisted of:

- representatives from the IGO coalition that first raised the issue and who 
participate in the GAC as observers (including the OECD, WIPO and the UN); 

- the GAC Chair, 

- and Board representatives from the new gTLD program committee that was in 
place at the time this issue came to light  (primarily Chris Disspain). 

I gather  a few others attended some of the meetings as well - e.g. Donna 
Austin and Mason Cole.

The group is not decisional - just an ad-hoc group formed to see if they could 
come up with a proposal that they thought would be acceptable to the GNSO.   

Regards,

Bruce Tonkin