ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal
  • From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:30:11 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
  • In-reply-to: <089001d22431$8e808330$ab818990$@paulmcgrady.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <F00E4D21-2FAB-4341-8AFF-48E9A52F7411@icann.org> <089001d22431$8e808330$ab818990$@paulmcgrady.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHSI4RnfYLKmlnbc0OuJeKOpW+x7qCjdG6AgAEQLNA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] FOR REVIEW: IGO acronyms - differences between GNSO policy, GAC advice and the small group proposal
Hello Paul,

>>  Also, apologies if this has been asked & answered, but I didn’t see a list 
>> of participants in the “small group” that the Board references.  Do we know 
>> who those members are?

The group was formed in October 2014.


I don’t have names of individuals but it seems to have consisted of:

- representatives from the IGO coalition that first raised the issue and who 
participate in the GAC as observers (including the OECD, WIPO and the UN); 

- the GAC Chair, 

- and Board representatives from the new gTLD program committee that was in 
place at the time this issue came to light  (primarily Chris Disspain). 

I gather  a few others attended some of the meetings as well - e.g. Donna 
Austin and Mason Cole.

The group is not decisional - just an ad-hoc group formed to see if they could 
come up with a proposal that they thought would be acceptable to the GNSO.   

Regards,

Bruce Tonkin
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>