<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment
- To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Revised Motion on Drafting Team/Empowerment
- From: Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:12:41 +0200
- Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <3F023674933B4AC59F7D3966BC01CD66@WUKPC>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <019c01d1d180$22e8db80$68ba9280$@paulmcgrady.com> <57737577.5010700@julf.com> <CACpVkK3XJCbMQGKKW77p8VVb7UEaV8Z05pPR5CD2D4cTGZ+hsA@mail.gmail.com> <57739C57.5060504@julf.com> <CACpVkK0R3MqCLe2vMj1midt5J7V1hTd=Pz85JroVdAsVRCzUww@mail.gmail.com> <5773B297.3060501@julf.com> <3F023674933B4AC59F7D3966BC01CD66@WUKPC>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
Wolf-Ulrich,
> Please send your nomination (s) to me, and the ISPCP constituency
> shall forward it on behalf of the NCA.
Thank you - your pragmatic approach is much appreciated. In this case
I am not so much concerned about me personally being able to nominate
anyone as much as I am concerned that the NCA's as an institution should
be represented. After all, I am already halfway through my term, so it won't
affect me personally, but I am a big believer in the role of the NCA's
in the
GNSO structure.
Julf
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|