Re: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review WP Analysis
Wolf-Ulrich, Amr, all, I¹ve made some updates to the letter which aim to capture your input (see attached). Please suggest alternative language if this does not correctly capture the points made. Best regards, Marika From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday 21 April 2016 at 07:02 To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review WP Analysis Hi Wolf-Ulrich. 1. Shouldn¹t the letter be addressed to the OEC chair? ? Good catch, I agree. 2. Do we expect action/approval from the OEC or board re starting the implementation planning? Then we should express it. ? Yes, we should establish this expectation Thanks? J. From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 5:54 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review WP Analysis Thanks Marika, 1. Shouldn¹t the letter be addressed to the OEC chair? 2. Do we expect action/approval from the OEC or board re starting the implementation planning? Then we should express it. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Marika Konings <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 4:45 AM To: GNSO Council List <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [council] For your review - proposed transmittal letter GNSO Review WP Analysis Dear All, Please find attached for your review, the proposed transmittal letter to the Board¹s Organisational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) concerning the adoption by the GNSO Council of the GNSO Review Working Party¹s Feasibility and Prioritisation Analysis of the GNSO Review recommendations. As you will note, placeholder language has been included to accommodate any additional comments GNSO Council members may want to include concerning the feasibility and priority of the GNSO Review recommendations, as discussed during the Council meeting. If you want to add any comments in relation to the feasibility and prioritisation of the recommendations, please provide those at the latest by Friday 22 April. As noted during the Council meeting as well as pointed out in the draft letter, the next phase of work will focus on the development of the implementation plan so any comments related to that aspect of the process should be reserved for the next phase. Thanks, Marika Attachment:
Transmittal letter - GNSO Review WP analysis - updated 21 April 2016.docx Attachment:
smime.p7s
|