<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf
Hi David, all
If I could make one plea on this topic it is that we go into Meeting B with an
open mind and save the constructive feedback for after the meeting.
Meeting B will be significantly different from Meetings A and C, in that it is
intended to be about policy and will be conducted over 4 days. If it transpires
that Meeting B does not live up to expectations and allow for policy work to
be progressed to the extent that this would have been achieved with an
additional day via the Pilot Program, then we can discuss how to move forward
to best address any shortcomings.
We need to be careful not to shoot the messenger. Nick is implementing
recommendations that came from the Meeting Strategy Working Group (a cross
community work group that had representation from across the community
including the GNSO and the GAC) and was approved by the Board. As a member of
the MSWG, I feel very strongly about being able to give Meeting B its best
opportunity for success or failure.
Thanks for your understanding.
Donna
Donna Austin: Neustar, Inc.
Policy and Industry Affairs Manager
Cell: +1.310.890.9655 Email:
donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify me immediately and delete the original message.
Follow Neustar: [cid:image001.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/neustarinc>
[cid:image002.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0]
LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/company/5349>
[cid:image003.png@01CC3CD3.5F595DC0] Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/neustar>
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David Cake
Sent: Thursday, 14 April 2016 7:14 AM
To: James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>; GNSO Council List
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf
Which means option a) - Nick does not understand what the Pilot Program is, and
is confusing incorporporating PDP work into meeting B with incorporating the
Pilot Program into meeting B (which there are no plans to do).
In short, a very disappointing answer.
David
On 14 Apr 2016, at 10:09 AM, James M. Bladel
<jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi David -
We can confirm with Nick, but I don’t think the implication was for the
face-to-face to encompass an entire day (25%!) of Meeting B. Only that the
topic itself would be included in to the schedule/agenda for the Policy Forum.
Something we can discuss further on our call in a few hours.
Thanks-
J.
From: David Cake <davecake@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:davecake@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 9:06
To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, GNSO
Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf
Absorbing the full day Working Groups Pilot program into the schedule implies
that they believe it is practical to ask Working Group members will take an
extended period (usually a full day or nearly so for the Pilot Program so far)
out from an already short and overpacked meeting.
I am finding this hard to understand in terms other than Nick is either a)
lacking in understanding of what the pilot program consists of and is confusing
it with more routine policy work or b) has entirely unrealistic ideas about the
scheduling of working group members or c) is making some kind of joke.
I’d frankly he rather had just said no than make this rather impractical
suggestion of incorporation.
Regards
David
On 14 Apr 2016, at 5:10 AM, Glen de Saint Géry
<Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear Councillors,
This letter has been published at:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/correspondence<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailer.samanage.com_wf_click-3Fupn-3DKTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnral-2D2F6hkupRgT5qivhStIqpYc9ooSSrDMzEeq-2D2Fiww6R68D9Jo9rkUR8S6u0weY6PIg-2D3D-2D3D-5Fr-2D2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2D2BX-2D2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2D2FB1vqqq7KS-2D2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2D2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2D2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2D2FPie9e6zmA6P8LI3FeKUEh3xT4riLnCHsO7nMzouRMxXUd8TFnl-2D2B2k3feMxMaOVnmFY1Ar1JT8Kd1-2D2F4VE2cFnc3gbVA6h4K3YyhG3Dn6e4CXjNlyeIFaI4w8B-2D2Fa2b7-2D2FBJ7PsedghUPNMaRGX-2D2FLAIAm0okbeKAU7OJY95gz7XiFrQdun7fbit2Z4FCJkilIp-2D2BqY3jN3cP-2D2BWyMLwWohCfuK-2D2F9a-2D2BJ2NZniUclqazjfIlkTV6eYKN1vl7c2eADhOC-2D2BmdQpCcmAC5ZFnwUqn-2D2FcONyLUyQBUN7Q34DUXi0YNXnYNE8zFpI8BrHm-2D2BkAU-2D3D&d=CwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=sG1Lt1CR9t4GOnP4WYgYZdtRjWYGhMmi4dbVIARjbwQ&s=rsFaD-5u7EbKeiU7DbT94faaf6nIMA7wYQf2lBedncc&e=>
http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/tomasso-to-bladel-13apr16-en.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailer.samanage.com_wf_click-3Fupn-3DKTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnral-2D2F6hkupRgT5qivhStIqoExAjgxJgreLIp0IioJuTv-2D2Fb-2D2BnjpU41y3huUg-2D2Bcjfp2io3E5AFPJ9mDVdHCMZMPdM-2D3D-5Fr-2D2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2D2BX-2D2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2D2FB1vqqq7KS-2D2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2D2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2D2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2D2FPie9e6zmA6P8LI3FeKUEh3xT4riLnCHsO7nMzouRMxXUd8TFnl-2D2B2k3feMxMaOVnmFY1Ar1JT8Kd1-2D2F4VE2cFnc3gbVA6h4K3YyhG3Dn6e4CXjNlyeIFaI4w8Cuz18FBu7x7vilFPmA-2D2B7NMpdvjlkkySD6HrY5tbqZ-2D2Bl7I2-2D2BXlcSUynQDV8FiBSx1GC2c2N4Q0hXbGBGzwnL2t3vwfFcM88wKwKs3fUcqQsWXVGv2EFOBBVAPdTtW0kblexDoBngZGUTTi23r5Yc4w0SL6RSHfhkSTiEBjYDZBbG62Kuad-2D2BYQ7n1zQPkoJSsXA-2D3D&d=CwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=sG1Lt1CR9t4GOnP4WYgYZdtRjWYGhMmi4dbVIARjbwQ&s=NwJmCinjA0PGtLjGneHBtgx9Ci5gbZwCb4jamP5e7Tw&e=>
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
De : owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de James M. Bladel
Envoyé : jeudi 14 avril 2016 04:41
À : GNSO Council List
Objet : [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf
Councilor Colleagues -
Please see attached for a letter form Nick Tomasso, responding to our earlier
request regarding a face-to-face PDP meeting. During our discussions in
Marrakech and with smaller groups, we have tried to balance the value of having
these sessions at ICANN meetings, while trying to remain faithful to the
intention of the "Meeting B” policy forum concept.
As for Nick’s response, I would like to draw your attention to this statement
in particular:
"It is anticipated that the PDP Working Groups Pilot Program will be absorbed
into the 'Meeting B' schedule rather than having an additional day specifically
for that purpose."
I agree that the Policy Forum concept must recognize the importance of
advancing the work of ongoing PDPs, but would emphasize incorporating these in
to the 4 day schedule, rather than add an optional 5th day.
I welcome thoughts from others on this topics and Nicks’ letter, and I’m
looking forward to further discussions on tomorrow’s call.
Thank you,
J.
From: <owner-gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>> on
behalf of "Tanzanica S. King"
<tanzanica.king@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tanzanica.king@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 21:26
To: "gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>>,
"Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx>"
<board-ops-team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:board-ops-team@xxxxxxxxx>>, Marika Konings
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>, Sally Costerton
<sally.costerton@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sally.costerton@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-chairs] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf
Dear James,
Please find the attached letter from Nick Tomasso concerning your request for
face-to-face sessions of PDP Working Groups linked to ICANN56.
Best regards,
Tanzanica
________________________________
Tanzanica S. King
Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design
ICANN
Office +1 310 301 5800
Mobile +1 310 995 3038
Email king@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:king@xxxxxxxxx>
www.icann.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org_&d=CwMFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=4A3LwUUER9_CePZ11QJsr56eryGQiPHEqv4TL7JH87w&m=sG1Lt1CR9t4GOnP4WYgYZdtRjWYGhMmi4dbVIARjbwQ&s=PO9IfZlpXqg5uJj8KEKwRhaRoHBa7DO-gIAeZSosSHU&e=>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|