Re: [council] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi David -

We can confirm with Nick, but I don't think the implication was for the 
face-to-face to encompass an entire day (25%!) of Meeting B.  Only that the 
topic itself would be included in to the schedule/agenda for the Policy Forum.  
Something we can discuss further on our call in a few hours.

Thanks-

J.

From: David Cake <davecake@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:davecake@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 9:06
To: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, GNSO 
Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf

Absorbing the full day Working Groups Pilot program into the schedule implies 
that they believe it is practical to ask Working Group members will take an 
extended period (usually a full day or nearly so for the Pilot Program so far) 
out from an already short and overpacked meeting.

I am finding this hard to understand in terms other than Nick is either a) 
lacking in understanding of what the pilot program consists of and is confusing 
it with more routine policy work or b) has entirely unrealistic ideas about the 
scheduling of working group members or c) is making some kind of joke.

I'd frankly he rather had just said no than make this rather impractical 
suggestion of incorporation.

Regards

David



On 14 Apr 2016, at 5:10 AM, Glen de Saint Géry 
<Glen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Dear Councillors,

This letter has been published at:

http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/correspondence<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=KTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnral-2F6hkupRgT5qivhStIqpYc9ooSSrDMzEeq-2Fiww6R68D9Jo9rkUR8S6u0weY6PIg-3D-3D_r-2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2BX-2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2FB1vqqq7KS-2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2FPie9e6zmA6P8LI3FeKUEh3xT4riLnCHsO7nMzouRMxXUd8TFnl-2B2k3feMxMaOVnmFY1Ar1JT8Kd1-2F4VE2cFnc3gbVA6h4K3YyhG3Dn6e4CXjNlyeIFaI4w8B-2Fa2b7-2FBJ7PsedghUPNMaRGX-2FLAIAm0okbeKAU7OJY95gz7XiFrQdun7fbit2Z4FCJkilIp-2BqY3jN3cP-2BWyMLwWohCfuK-2F9a-2BJ2NZniUclqazjfIlkTV6eYKN1vl7c2eADhOC-2BmdQpCcmAC5ZFnwUqn-2FcONyLUyQBUN7Q34DUXi0YNXnYNE8zFpI8BrHm-2BkAU-3D>
http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/tomasso-to-bladel-13apr16-en.pdf<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=KTB340yHI8DoUtMP4BGJnral-2F6hkupRgT5qivhStIqoExAjgxJgreLIp0IioJuTv-2Fb-2BnjpU41y3huUg-2Bcjfp2io3E5AFPJ9mDVdHCMZMPdM-3D_r-2BdYbSjRm9r0i9vSiPZtW-2BX-2BAwnBbxYJcYft8cAni3iLz7nHdH1TO6yId4yJ1X5bCjn7UQ8ekPGWrKZXzU-2FB1vqqq7KS-2BMznRij3m3ZEI87WW3StxS8dTPOoQSB9krb-2FFJK2QHBzOYchxlxB81-2FrQgEKCZwhIWmFeV3hThjRR7ogCkshuA-2FPie9e6zmA6P8LI3FeKUEh3xT4riLnCHsO7nMzouRMxXUd8TFnl-2B2k3feMxMaOVnmFY1Ar1JT8Kd1-2F4VE2cFnc3gbVA6h4K3YyhG3Dn6e4CXjNlyeIFaI4w8Cuz18FBu7x7vilFPmA-2B7NMpdvjlkkySD6HrY5tbqZ-2Bl7I2-2BXlcSUynQDV8FiBSx1GC2c2N4Q0hXbGBGzwnL2t3vwfFcM88wKwKs3fUcqQsWXVGv2EFOBBVAPdTtW0kblexDoBngZGUTTi23r5Yc4w0SL6RSHfhkSTiEBjYDZBbG62Kuad-2BYQ7n1zQPkoJSsXA-3D>

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen

De : owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de James M. Bladel
Envoyé : jeudi 14 avril 2016 04:41
À : GNSO Council List
Objet : [council] FW: [gnso-chairs] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf

Councilor Colleagues -

Please see attached for a letter form Nick Tomasso, responding to our earlier 
request regarding a face-to-face PDP meeting.   During our discussions in 
Marrakech and with smaller groups, we have tried to balance the value of having 
these sessions at ICANN meetings, while trying to remain faithful to the 
intention of the "Meeting B" policy forum concept.

As for Nick's response, I would like to draw your attention to this statement 
in particular:
"It is anticipated that the PDP Working Groups Pilot Program will be absorbed 
into the 'Meeting B' schedule rather than having an additional day specifically 
for that purpose."

I agree that the Policy Forum concept must recognize the importance of 
advancing the work of ongoing PDPs, but would emphasize incorporating these in 
to the 4 day schedule, rather than add an optional 5th day.

I welcome thoughts from others on this topics and Nicks' letter, and I'm 
looking forward to further discussions on tomorrow's call.

Thank you,

J.



From: <owner-gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of "Tanzanica S. King" 
<tanzanica.king@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:tanzanica.king@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 21:26
To: "gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: David Olive <david.olive@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:david.olive@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<board-ops-team@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:board-ops-team@xxxxxxxxx>>, Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>, Sally Costerton 
<sally.costerton@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:sally.costerton@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-chairs] Letter to James Bladel_13Apr16.pdf

Dear James,

Please find the attached letter from Nick Tomasso concerning your request for 
face-to-face sessions of PDP Working Groups linked to ICANN56.

Best regards,

Tanzanica


________________________________
Tanzanica S. King
Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design
ICANN

Office   +1 310 301 5800
Mobile  +1 310 995 3038
Email    king@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:king@xxxxxxxxx>
www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/>