ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Voting Statements

  • To: "'Thomas Rickert'" <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Voting Statements
  • From: "Paul McGrady \(Policy\)" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:22:37 -0500
  • Cc: "'James M. Bladel'" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Marika Konings'" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council List'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <A03A1E64-70C7-407E-8CAD-9963D16AFB15@rickert.net>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <89A78B49-85D7-4092-8D1B-A45E49C22A2A@paulmcgrady.com> <D30C397F.65DD6%marika.konings@icann.org> <D30C8150.B37C7%jbladel@godaddy.com> <56E83D83.9040701@rickert.net> <008801d1812f$aff80c90$0fe825b0$@paulmcgrady.com> <A03A1E64-70C7-407E-8CAD-9963D16AFB15@rickert.net>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQKvfX3k2IK/iYoV50RFMRBFAQOmqgIwNZdlAsnbrH8CKYNw9QHUVCk8AzsHDKOdQgSHYA==

Thanks Thomas.  Looking forward to seeing the letter.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 11:13 AM
To: Paul McGrady (Policy)
Cc: James M. Bladel; Marika Konings; GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] Voting Statements

 

Hello Paul,

thanks for your note. 

 

I will send the CCWG letter, which was sent to the Board directly to Larry 
Strickling drawing his attention to the statements made by the Chartering 
Organizations and add that there is an expactation that these statements will 
be passed on to Congress with the report. 

 

Kind regards,

Thomas

---

rickert.net

eco.de

 


Am 18.03.2016 um 17:03 schrieb Paul McGrady (Policy) <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Thanks Thomas.  This is a bit less robust than advertised.  Can you please
do more for us to ensure that what was sent to NTIA (which presumably
reaches Congress) actually contained these statements?  I don't think it is
reasonable to assume that NTIA users of the CCWG will automatically attach
our voting statements to whatever they communicate to Congress and others in
Washington.  If we can't get certainty on that, then I may need to go back
to my constituency and get permission to take a more direct route.  Thanks
in advance for your anticipated follow through on the promise that our
statements would be included in the package sent to the NTIA.  

Regards,
Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Rickert [mailto:thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 11:51 AM
To: James M. Bladel; Marika Konings; Paul McGrady; GNSO Council List
(council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [council] Voting Statements

Hi James,
I can confirm that we have referenced to all papers form the Chartering
Organizations and the GNSO repsonse includes the IPC statement, amongst
others.

While I have not seen (but it may just be me) reference to the Chartering
Organizations' letters in the Board submission to NTIA, I should mention
that NTIA representatives are on the CCWG list and have therefore taken note
of the Chartering Orgs statements.

I hope this helps.

Thomas

Am 14.03.2016 um 20:57 schrieb James M. Bladel:



Thanks, Marika.  

 

If I¹m understanding your message, we sent all materials to CCWG-ACCT, 

and these were references in their submission to the Board...but we 

have no confirmation that the Board included these materials in their 

submission to NTIA.  Is this correct?

 

If so, then perhaps we could raise this question with Thomas.  And I 

presume there is nothing to prevent us from submitting these directly 

to the folks at NTIA.

 

Thank you,

 

J.

 

 

On 3/14/16, 11:00 , "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Marika 

Konings" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of 

marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Paul, for your information, please find attached the transmittal 

message

from the CCWG-Accountability to the ICANN Board, which includes a 

link to

the message that James sent which included the transmittal letter and 

attachments with statements as well as voting record. The transmittal 

message from the ICANN Board to NTIA can be found here

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-Mar

ch/01

1

720.html. As far as I can tell, the ICANN Board transmittal does not 

seem to include the details of the consideration by the different 

chartering organisations, but I may have missed it as there are a 

number of attachments that have been provided.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

On 14/03/16 09:00, "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Paul 

McGrady" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of 

policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

James,

 

Can you confirm that, as promised, the CCWG-ACCT passed along the 

various voting statements to the Board and the Board, in turn, has 

passed them along to the NTIA?  These are an important part of the 

record and we were assured they would end up in the hands of the 

NTIA. Hopefully, that happened as advertised. Thanks for checking 

and getting back to the List with news.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

Sent from my iPhone

 


-- 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>