ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Extra day

  • To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Extra day
  • From: Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:30:41 +0100
  • Cc: Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TE//rAZs8jfSekb94+QbYqTBz4XSFdkmBoPVIjHLnoI=; b=u8mJCU74ybpPSrADP3ZpxICmFuUhrAmiOVzKEPjSUNGAYqcW4j/aIVuM11RBqFJ17S WDHFHQO2FR/yIOYA3BHJWgHTfw+eJxp/9on+sA3SKcJy2XI74awq/ARS9quJGr99g4zk 1VYojZa265JYBulElXPxV6ODCcx8BlDAeKo29MRaQAIP2tKIVAQZ233nb9EElnMJOT1p OcuBXJaIUOjaIfHomIRUKPH9/etD3dDhk7baErDtUing1dmBHhYRwbY+nqGBwmFJPp1c PG7CK/Msr8ynqBdYqwI/iyC+mQjU+xVuKtOxVwSbuBx8NAf9C7Oos3XKTlsbhVd0adhg EmVA==
  • In-reply-to: <80AED308-D80E-4194-9A13-2043EE4B70CD@nic.br>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <C6749782-C4A3-4CDB-A915-2B3A166E6350@nic.br> <34A06B09-C063-444A-91E7-24F5D0C79AFC@davecake.net> <C0F1BF9D-FD0D-4949-8BA3-340FD772C6EC@toast.net> <80AED308-D80E-4194-9A13-2043EE4B70CD@nic.br>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
On 10-03-16 23:22, Rubens Kuhl wrote:

> possible flight rescheduling costs are for ICANN to pay.

On that note, I am still still slightly concerned about the
TripCase notifications I keep getting for gate changes for
the flights ICANN Travel originally suggested to me but that
I declined. I assume the flights got entered into TripCase
and never removed, but has anyone ever followed up and
made sure there aren't unused (and wasted) flight bookings
being made?

    Julf
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>