ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal

  • To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal
  • From: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:52:03 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=cx4DWGcuVfV+8uP7QNCppZOjuG95QUGDy8tb7UeCW/Q=; b=KOqbkpSbxpF4xwZPmOb0qj60Xq7Ff52YXEvL5xlD593/FRYEff0/MmiXJMsjanB0cQ LrcEiSabb1FQppdjM5L4A8Pwg8vw0P4XRU4fJaKPMk1uLkBJcuRYUj/q5YoHoc5HdVII bpJmxEWRUOokyr0xik9b1nPJA8EoWxfgu2PXGgy5t2B1hBQ0NVn1BLPQA7LFJBjEDdrV Mi6tNlAms/pPus+dCrheoqj4EFq55tkRIoFBnj6Ma37NtWLGTUq5bp+0cXDWJF9ML3zj m34TWfOEHti5yyy3Lc3thWwU+Ox4oXqLob9idNPmLhyDbQEiSnhzGlQ/0echR4RpJ9sL OQfw==
  • In-reply-to: <D3044F5F.B25E9%jbladel@godaddy.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D3044B85.659BF%marika.konings@icann.org> <D3044F5F.B25E9%jbladel@godaddy.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHReR0pFTlv2qqP+EeHD4DHCWi9RZ9PTEgAgAABhHA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal
It would also be helpful to know, by tonight, if any councilor intends to vote 
against the entire package, in the (hopefully) unlikely event we get to that 
point.

Regards,
Keith

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 9:46 AM
To: Marika Konings; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability 
Supplemental Final Proposal

Thanks, Marika.

And just a reminder to Councilors to come to the prep session tonight with your 
list of Recommendations for which you'd like to conduct individual votes.  I 
suspect the lists will be small and mostly contain the same Recommendations.

Thanks-

J.


From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 9:30
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability 
Supplemental Final Proposal

Not having received any responses, please note that the process as circulated 
and attached here again will be used to consider the CCWG-Accountability 
Supplemental Final Proposal. As a reminder, the next deadline is:

Tuesday - 18.00 - 19.00 UTC (Informal GNSO Council meeting)

Each Council member is expected to declare which of the recommendations they 
would like to have subject to an individual roll call vote.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Sunday 6 March 2016 at 18:04
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability 
Supplemental Final Proposal

Dear All,

Following our conversations today, please find attached on behalf of James the 
proposed approach for dealing with the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final 
Proposal. Please take note of the deadline for comments, questions and 
clarifications on this proposed approach which is Monday 18.00 UTC.

Best regards,

Marika
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>