ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal

  • To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:45:39 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: icann.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;icann.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=RmvNiCCWHQhayV0U+Eb3HTAFdjffzA81f14LNDjt154=; b=jWK6i4HIyWuIlai699UY0izUOtTWXVlUQXcU+giUfiXXvZetS2Ltb1wJogAQLBf5ki4UXFa0yxaQWsgH0kCrmWjoXNYyZ8PgsCnn0EOgLN4lW9vd/YSY3syBclk/Z3HboBGASNz6m3v0XXpp+b8wFjZ0Ifk7PQ8Y6ZgplkTV4z0=
  • In-reply-to: <D3044B85.659BF%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D3044B85.659BF%marika.konings@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AQHReR0pFTlv2qqP+EeHD4DHCWi9RZ9PTEgA
  • Thread-topic: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal
Thanks, Marika.

And just a reminder to Councilors to come to the prep session tonight with your 
list of Recommendations for which you'd like to conduct individual votes.  I 
suspect the lists will be small and mostly contain the same Recommendations.

Thanks-

J.


From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 9:30
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability 
Supplemental Final Proposal

Not having received any responses, please note that the process as circulated 
and attached here again will be used to consider the CCWG-Accountability 
Supplemental Final Proposal. As a reminder, the next deadline is:

Tuesday - 18.00 - 19.00 UTC (Informal GNSO Council meeting)

·      Each Council member is expected to declare which of the recommendations 
they would like to have subject to an individual roll call vote.


Best regards,

Marika

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Sunday 6 March 2016 at 18:04
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] For your review - proposed approach CCWG-Accountability 
Supplemental Final Proposal

Dear All,

Following our conversations today, please find attached on behalf of James the 
proposed approach for dealing with the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final 
Proposal. Please take note of the deadline for comments, questions and 
clarifications on this proposed approach which is Monday 18.00 UTC.

Best regards,

Marika
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>