ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability
  • From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 05:16:13 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
  • Cc: "avri@xxxxxxx" <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <56D051A0.4020504@julf.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D2F36706.62D6B%marika.konings@icann.org> <A416941AD213C9428D623560432AFBB62DDA8873@STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com> <SG2PR06MB11983A3AA2BD05707ED1BBA8CFA60@SG2PR06MB1198.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <D2F4A82B.63414%marika.konings@icann.org> <D2F4B1CC.B0237%jbladel@godaddy.com> <3c1e39d4815c4131bdba0046bcc2a711@toast.net> <263EE96C7DADD44CB3D5A07DBD41D0E88F8A3510@bne3-0001mitmbx.corp.mit> <56D051A0.4020504@julf.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHRbz16pyb006H4N0u7BC0FsqPKq587sfFQgADqqKaAAKBJAP//phoA///PU4CAAWOxEP//lWoAADY1SaA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] For your review - draft motion and approach CCWG-Accountability
Hello Johan,


>>  I have to say that the minority statement from Avri sets a tough standard 
>> for a NCA minority opinion - that level of insightful analysis and rationale 
>> is something I can only look up to for inspiration, but I am unlikely to 
>> ever achieve anything that lives up to that.

Well - you are talking about the winner of the ICANN Multistakeholder Ethos 
Award in June 2014 :-)

https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-06-23-en

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>