RE: [council] For final review - GNSO Council letter on CCWG Accountability Third Draft Proposal

["Paul McGrady \(Policy\)" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks James.  I think the broader the audience, the better.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 10:42 AM
To: Marika Konings; GNSO Council List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: Re: [council] For final review - GNSO Council letter on CCWG
Accountability Third Draft Proposal

 

Hi folks -

 

Just a reminder that we are looking to transmit this to the CCWG -today-.
So please give it one final review & let Marika & I know if you spot any
errors or omissions.

 

Also, if there are no objections, I propose that I could post this to the
CCWG list in addition to sending it directly to the Co-Chairs. This would
increase visibility and be a show of support for the GNSO participants on
the CCWG.  Any objections?

 

Thanks-

 

J.

 

 

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Marika Konings
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 16:56 
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] For final review - GNSO Council letter on CCWG
Accountability Third Draft Proposal

 

Dear All,

 

As discussed during today's meeting, please find attached the final version
of the letter and accompanying table to the CCWG-Accountability, both in
redline and clear version. Please review this version and if there are any
issues that have been overlooked, please send those to the list by Friday
23.00 UTC at the latest. 

 

Thanks,

 

Marika