<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] For final review - GNSO Council letter on CCWG Accountability Third Draft Proposal
- To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] For final review - GNSO Council letter on CCWG Accountability Third Draft Proposal
- From: Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:52:15 +0100
- Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <D2C7B76C.A8285%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <D2C7B76C.A8285%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
James,
> Also, if there are no objections, I propose that I could post this to the CCWG
> list in addition to sending it directly to the Co-Chairs. This would increase
> visibility and be a show of support for the GNSO participants on the CCWG.
> Any
> objections?
Sounds like a good idea.
Julf
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|