Re: [council] A note about signature lines

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Best wishes to all!

For the record, the ICANN Bylaws refer to the GNSO Chair, not the GNSO
Council Chair.

Best regards,

Marika

On 04/01/16 15:06, "owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of James M.
Bladel" <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>Hi Wolf-Ulrich.
>
>Sure, that¹s an easy fix and a more accurate sig line.
>
>Thanks‹
>
>J.
>
>
>On 1/4/16, 5:35 , "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Thanks for this, James. And a Happy New Year to all - never toolate!
>>
>>With respect to your signing I've noticed that in the correspondence
>>external to the GNSO you sign as "GNSO chair". I wonder whether "GNSO
>>council chair" wouldn't be the more correct term.
>>
>>Best regards
>>
>>Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>From: James M. Bladel
>>Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2015 4:38 PM
>>To: GNSO Council List
>>Subject: [council] A note about signature lines
>>
>>
>>Hi folks:
>>
>>Most of you probably couldn't care less, but I wanted to put a note on
>>the 
>>record regarding my email signature lines.
>>
>>Many of my past messages to the Council list (like this one) will end
>>with 
>>"GoDaddy".  This should be read as a label/indicator of my email account,
>>rather than a representation of a position from my company & employer.
>>
>>Like many of you, I maintain several email accounts (work, personal,
>>football arguments, etc.), and access all of them via my phone and other
>>mobile devices.  In order to ensure that I don't post from the wrong
>>email 
>>address, I'm likely to use an inappropriate signature line.
>>
>>I apologize for any confusion this may cause on the list or in the
>>archives, 
>>and will make a point to be more mindful of this going forward.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>J.
>>____________
>>James Bladel
>>GoDaddy 
>>
>
>