<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] A note about signature lines
- To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] A note about signature lines
- From: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:35:05 +0100
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <98B72791-D696-42BD-8642-88CE2DB82FF1@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <98B72791-D696-42BD-8642-88CE2DB82FF1@godaddy.com>
- Reply-to: "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for this, James. And a Happy New Year to all - never toolate!
With respect to your signing I've noticed that in the correspondence
external to the GNSO you sign as "GNSO chair". I wonder whether "GNSO
council chair" wouldn't be the more correct term.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
From: James M. Bladel
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2015 4:38 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] A note about signature lines
Hi folks:
Most of you probably couldn't care less, but I wanted to put a note on the
record regarding my email signature lines.
Many of my past messages to the Council list (like this one) will end with
"GoDaddy". This should be read as a label/indicator of my email account,
rather than a representation of a position from my company & employer.
Like many of you, I maintain several email accounts (work, personal,
football arguments, etc.), and access all of them via my phone and other
mobile devices. In order to ensure that I don't post from the wrong email
address, I'm likely to use an inappropriate signature line.
I apologize for any confusion this may cause on the list or in the archives,
and will make a point to be more mindful of this going forward.
Thanks,
J.
____________
James Bladel
GoDaddy
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|