<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal - CORRECTION
- To: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal - CORRECTION
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:12:38 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx;
- Cc: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx>, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=1zMcdybK+ZMhUU9O2yasHughuH24pOhHf4GjgmRojFI=; b=4Xe0Tz45to/4ETjR/t21/ym5gvcMYijJ/0T+FzAj5EzlKNynQlJyl7VRcajJscCtKsmP9lxLCQvJghy3J8avs1BD6AmGh7vaheG8Z/Gu9wDBxGiy0KS0EhN8uAUobamyoqJsgUKeoHf8c6DJ9M85ZSBnk117Ray4ocTNMqX3zfc=
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
- Thread-index: AQHRQACeLQrRwsJRC0uC6YoBT+N48Q==
- Thread-topic: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal - CORRECTION
CCGW-ACCT Co-Chairs
26 DEC 2015
Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:
Please note that my previous message included incorrect information for the
positions submitted on behalf of the NCSG, NCUC and NPOC. Those references
should instead read as follows:
Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG)
Survey Response -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html
Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
Comment -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
Survey Response -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html
I apologize for any confusion resulting from my error.
Thank you,
James Bladel
GNSO Chair
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 10:55
To: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
<leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Mathieu Weill
<mathieu.weill@xxxxxxxx<mailto:mathieu.weill@xxxxxxxx>>, Thomas Rickert
<thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx>>,
Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx>>, James
Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal
Sending on behalf of James Bladel, GNSO Chair:
CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs
Re: GNSO Review of Third Draft Proposal
24 DEC 2015
Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:
Earlier this week, 21 Dec 2015, marked the close of the Public Comment period
covering the Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal. Unfortunately, due to
the size and diversity of the organizations that comprise the GNSO, and the
compressed time frame, we were unable to develop a unified GNSO response to the
12 Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability by the close of the comment
period.
Listed below are links to comments and survey responses submitted on behalf of
GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs). Additional submissions
were made on behalf of individuals and organizations that participate in the
GNSO from within one or more SG/C. We have formed a team tasked with analyzing
these responses, and using them to draft a harmonized position for
consideration by the GNSO Council in a special session convening on 14 January
2016 Presuming this position is successfully adopted, it will be transmitted to
you immediately following this session.
Once again, please accept our gratitude for dedication and patience in
shepherding this enormous and historic work unit over the past year. We are
very near the finish line, and look forward to further contributing our
thoughts to this document, and the Final CCWG-Accountability Proposal.
Thank you,
James Bladel
GNSO Chair
Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG):
Comment -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00035.html
Survey Response -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00034.html
Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)
Comment -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00084.html
Intellectual Property Interests Constituency (IPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00100.html
Internet Service Providers Constituency (ISPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
Survey Response -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00046.html
Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00064.html
Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
Comment -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
Survey Response -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html
Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
Survey Response -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|