Re: [council] Re: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal - CORRECTION

[Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear James,
thank you for your messages! We take good note of the updated references.

Kind regards,
Thomas

========
rickert.net

PS - Sent from my cell. Please excuse typos and brevity.

> Am 26.12.2015 um 18:12 schrieb James M. Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> CCGW-ACCT Co-Chairs
> 26 DEC 2015
> 
> Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:
> 
> Please note that my previous message included incorrect information for the 
> positions submitted on behalf of the NCSG, NCUC and NPOC.  Those references 
> should instead read as follows:
> 
> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG)
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html
>  
> Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Comment - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
>  
> Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html
> 
> I apologize for any confusion resulting from my error.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> James Bladel
> GNSO Chair
> 
> 
> 
> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 10:55 
> To: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Weill 
> <mathieu.weill@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx>, Alice Jansen 
> <alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx>, James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal
> 
> Sending on behalf of James Bladel, GNSO Chair:
> 
> CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs
> Re: GNSO Review of Third Draft Proposal
> 24 DEC 2015
> 
> 
> Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:
> 
> Earlier this week, 21 Dec 2015, marked the close of the Public Comment period 
> covering the Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal. Unfortunately, due to 
> the size and diversity of the organizations that comprise the GNSO, and the 
> compressed time frame, we were unable to develop a unified GNSO response to 
> the 12 Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability by the close of the comment 
> period.
> 
> Listed below are links to comments and survey responses submitted on behalf 
> of GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs).  Additional 
> submissions were made on behalf of individuals and organizations that 
> participate in the GNSO from within one or more SG/C.  We have formed a team 
> tasked with analyzing these responses, and using them to draft a harmonized 
> position for consideration by the GNSO Council in a special session convening 
> on 14 January 2016 Presuming this position is successfully adopted, it will 
> be transmitted to you immediately following this session.
> 
> Once again, please accept our gratitude for dedication and patience in 
> shepherding this enormous and historic work unit over the past year.  We are 
> very near the finish line, and look forward to further contributing our 
> thoughts to this document, and the Final CCWG-Accountability Proposal.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> James Bladel
> GNSO Chair
> 
> 
> Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG):
> Comment - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00035.html
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00034.html
> 
> Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)
> Comment - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00084.html
> 
> Intellectual Property Interests Constituency (IPC), Commercial Stakeholder 
> Group
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00100.html
> 
> Internet Service Providers Constituency (ISPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00046.html
> 
> Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00064.html
> 
> Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Comment - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html
> 
> Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html
> 
>