ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: Review of CCWG - ACCT Report

  • To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: Review of CCWG - ACCT Report
  • From: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:34:37 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:mime-version; bh=VXOilgpTMpjqaswJwednwDau2vwwrwQJ/9I2PyfNAFI=; b=iObAP26SQ8P+EjPTggX1COWIa8SNoJ9XXyOsb0j02h1byPmKk5ntDJ3lI8La2Opam3 R52IyTtJBaaaaJBNrYJBsRffygnyqNAjgri8Ht6dBmYqUcB/dymz7m3FnEHsdYgbDjOi ASZaloaBNixsJ+LnFKQsZIxHGA5ZCSU0qDB3YyFpIiewZ1+CAHr0fgt4Q5sw5FK4VMxN r3s1ybbh+77xSi5RKQhbffWOcxwJpl8md5GKl4Bafh954fibZPDfdlVcA0lvR6ducAkO ccEY+WDAPJnnL7wOAK0ms4uafpBU8HdBxaBU4mFsGT9W8aixqzH4Y03J1ln8jcOURXJZ +KYA==
  • In-reply-to: <D27DE387.9E796%jbladel@godaddy.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D27DE387.9E796%jbladel@godaddy.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHRKTJMpkjOjBnKh0KMZPR5dc2YRp67IDwg
  • Thread-topic: Review of CCWG - ACCT Report
Thanks James.

The RySG and RrSG held a joint teleconference today to discuss the 
CCWG-Accountability's Version 3 proposal and to map out next steps for 
consideration and possible comment. We are working now to develop our comments 
and any position statements on the proposal. I expect this work will be 
completed prior to the next GNSO Council call on December 17.

Regards,
Keith (RySG)

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 11:40 AM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Review of CCWG - ACCT Report

Colleagues -

Following up from our most recent call, and the actions associated with review 
of the next Draft Report from the CCWG-Accountabilty WG, it would be great if 
we can get out in front of any concerns that might be raised by the GNSO 
Community or the Council.  With this in mind, could we ask each SG/C to 
designate one Councilor to report back to the Council list with:

*  Efforts (planned or underway) in their SG/C to review & discuss the Draft 
Report
*  The expected time frame for completing the review, and any deadlines for the 
SG to raise concerns
*  Any issues or topics arising from this review that need to be discussed by 
the Council, and/or included in our response back to the CCWG.

The Draft Report is expected to be published on 30 Nov, with the comment period 
closing on 21 Dec.  No question that this is an extremely tight schedule, and 
hopefully this approach will allow us to gather topics for discussion on our 
next call on 17 Dec.

Thanks-

J.
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>