[council] Updated Proposed GNSO Council Meeting Agenda Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 15:00 UTC.

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Councillors,

Please find the updated proposed agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting Thursday, 
21 May 2015 at 15:00 UTC.
The agenda is also posted on page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-21may15-en.htm
And on the Wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+21+May+2015


The update relates to the addition of  Item 8: UPDATE - Progress of IGO-INGO 
Access to Curative Rights Mechanisms PDP Working Group (10 mins)

And in the previous edition the removal of Item 10: UPDATE - Progress of Cross 
Community Working Group on Framework of Principles for Future Cross Community 
Working Groups. It is expected that this update will be discussed in Buenos 
Aires.
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating 
Procedures<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf>, 
approved and updated on 13 November 2014.

For convenience:
·        An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is 
provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
·        An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee 
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.

Coordinated Universal Time: 15:00 UTC (http://tinyurl.com/nktk6rh)

08:00 Los Angeles; 11:00 Washington; 16:00 London; 17:00 Brussels; 23:00 Perth

GNSO Council Meeting Audio Cast
To join the event click on the link:
http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is 
needed.
___________________________________

Item 1: Administrative matters (5 mins)
1.1 - Roll Call
1.2 - Statement of interest updates
1.3 - Review/amend agenda
1.4. - Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO 
Operating Procedures:
Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting of 11 February, 19 March and 16 April 2015 
will be posted as approved on xxxx 2015.

Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (10 mins)

2.1 - Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics, 
to include review of Projects 
List<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and Action 
List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>.
2.2 - Comments or questions arising.

Item 3: Consent agenda (0 mins)

Item 4: DISCUSSION  - Cross Community Working Group to develop a transition 
proposal for IANA stewardship on naming related functions (15 mins)
The Cross Community Working Group to develop a transition proposal for IANA 
stewardship on naming related functions (CWG-Stewardship) was 
chartered<https://community.icann.org/x/2grxAg> to develop a proposal on Naming 
Related Functions for the IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal. A draft 
proposal was published for community comment on 1 December 2014, following 
which a revised timeline and update was provided for discussion at ICANN52 in 
Singapore. The CWG-Stewardship has 
published<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en>
 its updated proposal for public comment (ending on 20 May), with the goal of 
finalizing the proposal for submission to its chartering SO/ACs ahead of the 
ICANN53 Meeting to be held in Buenos Aires and subsequent submission to the 
IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG).
Given that the GNSO is a chartering organization of the CWG-Stewardship and 
will need to approve the group's final proposal, this is an opportunity for the 
Council to review the CWG's work and to discuss what, if any, issues will need 
to be addressed by the GNSO or Council at this critical stage.
4.1 - Status summary (Jonathan Robinson)
4.2 - Discussion
4.3 - Next steps
 Item 5: DISCUSSION - Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN 
Accountability - CCWG Accountability (15 mins)
In discussions around the IANA stewardship transition, the broader topic of the 
impact on ICANN's accountability was raised, given ICANN's historical 
contractual relationship with the United States government. The community 
concerns indicated that existing ICANN accountability mechanisms do not yet 
meet some stakeholders' expectations. Considering that the US Government 
(through the NTIA) has stressed that it expects community consensus on the 
transition, this gap between the current situation and stakeholder expectations 
needed to be addressed. This has been done through the formation and 
development of a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN 
Accountability - CCWG Accountability.
The CCWG-Accountability developed two work streams, of which Work Stream 1 is 
intended to align with the timing of the CWG-Transition work and the overall 
NTIA objectives and timeline. Initial proposals for Work Stream 1 were 
published<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-2015-05-04-en>
 for public comment on 4 May 2015 (closing on 3 June). As the GNSO is a 
chartering organization of the 
CCWG-Accountability<https://community.icann.org/x/ogDxAg>, having adopted the 
charter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/enhancing-accountability-charter-03nov14-en.pdf>
 in November 2014, this is an opportunity for the Council to review and discuss 
the CCWG's work and to discuss what, if any, issues will need to be addressed 
by the GNSO or Council at this critical stage.

5.1 - Status summary (Thomas Rickert)
5.2 - Discussion
5.3 - Next steps

Item 6: UPDATE - Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance (10 mins)
The 
charter<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52888213/Charter%20ccWG%20IG%202014%20v05.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1423208903000&api=v2>
 for this CWG was ratified between September 2014 and April 2015 by the ALAC, 
ccNSO and GNSO, having previously been an informal effort organized by the ALAC 
and the GNSO's Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group. The GNSO Council does not 
currently have a Council liaison to the CWG. Separately, the CWG has submitted 
a recent request to its Chartering Organizations to confirm interpretation of 
the chartered role of observers/participants in its work. Here the Council will 
receive an update on the CWG's progress, discuss both the liaison issue, and 
consider a non-objection to the CWG's proposed interpretation of the Charter.

6.1 - Status summary (Olivier Crépin-Leblond & Rafik Dammak)
6.2 - Consideration of non-objection to Charter interpretation
6.3 - Appointment of Council liaison
6.4 - General discussion and next steps

Item 7: UPDATE  - Progress of Cross-Community Working Group on Use of Country & 
Territory Names as TLDs (10 mins)

This CWG was jointly 
chartered<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48347158/Cross--%25E2%2580%2590Community%20WG%20Framework%20for%20Use%20of%20Country%20and%20Territory%20Names%20as%20TLDs%20%2528UCTN%20WG%2529%20Charter.pdf?version=2&modificationDate=1405410806000&api=v2>
 by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils in June 2014 to review the current status of 
representations of country and territory names under current ICANN policies, 
guidelines and procedures, and to provide advice regarding the feasibility of 
developing a consistent and uniform definitional framework that could be 
applicable across the respective SO/ACs. Here the Council will receive an 
update from the CWG co-chairs, and discuss the appointment of a new Council 
liaison to the CWG.

7.1 - 
Status<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/presentation-cwg-uctn-council-21may15-en.pptx>
 summary (Heather Forrest & Carlos Raul Gutierrez)
7.2 - Discussion
7.3 - Next steps





Item 8: UPDATE - Progress of IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Mechanisms PDP 
Working Group (10 mins)



This GNSO PDP Working Group was chartered to explore whether or not amendments 
to existing curative rights dispute resolution processes or the development of 
a new and specific procedure would be necessary to address the needs of 
International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International 
Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs). Through the GAC-GNSO liaison, it has 
sought to engage with the GAC and has also exchanged correspondence with a 
small representative group of IGOs. Here the Council will receive an update on 
the status of the GAC and IGO engagements, and discuss appropriate next steps 
for the WG.



8.1 - Status summary (Phil Corwin / Petter Rindforth / Mason Cole)

8.2 - Discussion

8.3 - Next steps




Item 9: UPDATE - Progress of New gTLDs Subsequent Rounds Discussion Group (10 
mins)



This Discussion Group was 
created<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406> by the GNSO 
Council in June 2014 to discuss experiences gained during the current expansion 
round of new gTLDs, and identify possible subjects for future Issue Reports 
that might result in changes to application procedures. Here the Council will 
receive an update on the status of the DG's work, with a view toward possible 
Council action on its recommendations in Buenos Aires.



9.1 - Status summary (Bret Fausett / Jeff Neuman / Liz Williams)

9.2 - Discussion

9.3 - Next steps







Item 10: UPDATE - GNSO Drafting Team on New ICANN Meeting Strategy (10 mins)
Following initial Council discussions on planning GNSO-related meetings at 
ICANN Public Meetings after implementation of the new ICANN meeting strategy, a 
Drafting Team comprised of several Council members was created to develop an 
initial 
proposal<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-council-proposal-new-meeting-strategy-29apr15-en.pdf>
 for Council consideration. Here the Council will receive an update on the 
status of the project, and consider next steps.


10.1 - Update (Volker Greimann / Marika Konings)

10.2 - Discussion

10.3 - Next steps


Item 11: UPDATE - Progress on GNSO Review (10 minutes)

The Independent Examiner appointed by the Board's Structural Improvements 
Committee to conduct the GNSO Review has shared its draft Initial Report with 
the GNSO's Working Party on this topic. The current intention is to publish the 
Initial Report for public comment following feedback from the Working Party, 
prior to the Buenos Aires meeting. Here the Council will receive an update on 
the Initial Report and proposed timelines for completing the Review.

11.1 - Update (Jennifer Wolfe)
11.2 - Discussion
11.3 - Next steps


Item 12: Any Other Business (5 mins)


12.1 - Buenos Aires meeting planning (update: David Cake / Jonathan Robinson)
12.2 - Any other business



_____________________________

Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO 
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or 
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting 
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in 
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an 
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than 
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO 
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative 
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) 
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved 
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter 
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final 
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a 
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO 
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups 
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting 
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of 
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority 
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the 
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the 
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council 
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority 
of the other House."

Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 
4.4<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>)
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council 
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced 
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In 
exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may 
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided 
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes 
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for 
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by 
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become 
available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a 
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 15:00
Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA 
(PDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>) 
UTC-7+1DST 08:00
San José, Costa Rica UTC-5+1DST  10:00
Iowa City, USA (CDT<http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%E2%88%9206:00>) UTC-5+1DST 
10:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-4+1DST 11:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+0DST 12:00
Montevideo, Uruguay 
(UYST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html>) 
UTC-3+0DST 12:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina 
(ART<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/art.html>) 
UTC-3+0DST 12:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 16:00
Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 17:00
Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2+0DST 17:00
Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+3+0DST 18:00
Ramat Hasharon, 
Israel(IDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.html>)
 UTC+3+0DST 18:00
Perth, Australia 
(WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>) 
UTC+8+1DST 23:00
Sydney/Hobart, Australia (AEDT) UTC+11+1DST 01:00 next day
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2015, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with 
exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
http://tinyurl.com/nktk6rh

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen


Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org