<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 15:00 UTC
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 15:00 UTC
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:45:41 +0000
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AdCNaeFho4GrVAC1Txab6PCvxwk5UA==
- Thread-topic: Proposed agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 15:00 UTC
Dear Councillors,
Please find the proposed agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on Thursday, 21
May 2015 at 15:00 UTC.
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating
Procedures<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf>,
approved and updated on 13 November 2014.
For convenience:
· An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is
provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
· An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Coordinated Universal Time: 15:00 UTC (http://tinyurl.com/nktk6rh)
08:00 Los Angeles; 11:00 Washington; 16:00 London; 17:00 Brussels; 23:00 Perth
GNSO Council Meeting Audio Cast
To join the event click on the link:
http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is
needed.
___________________________________
Item 1: Administrative matters (5 mins)
1.1 - Roll Call
1.2 - Statement of interest updates
1.3 - Review/amend agenda
1.4. - Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO
Operating Procedures:
Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting of 11 February, 19 March and 16 April 2015
will be posted as approved on xxxx 2015.
Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (10 mins)
2.1 - Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics,
to include review of Projects
List<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and Action
List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>.
2.2 - Comments or questions arising.
Item 3: Consent agenda (0 mins)
Item 4: DISCUSSION - Cross Community Working Group to develop a transition
proposal for IANA stewardship on naming related functions (15 mins)
The Cross Community Working Group to develop a transition proposal for IANA
stewardship on naming related functions (CWG-Stewardship) was
chartered<https://community.icann.org/x/2grxAg> to develop a proposal on Naming
Related Functions for the IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal. A draft
proposal was published for community comment on 1 December 2014, following
which a revised timeline and update was provided for discussion at ICANN52 in
Singapore. The CWG-Stewardship has
published<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/cwg-stewardship-draft-proposal-2015-04-22-en>
its updated proposal for public comment (ending on 20 May), with the goal of
finalizing the proposal for submission to its chartering SO/ACs ahead of the
ICANN53 Meeting to be held in Buenos Aires and subsequent submission to the
IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG).
Given that the GNSO is a chartering organization of the CWG-Stewardship and
will need to approve the group's final proposal, this is an opportunity for the
Council to review the CWG's work and to discuss what, if any, issues will need
to be addressed by the GNSO or Council at this critical stage.
4.1 - Status summary (Jonathan Robinson)
4.2 - Discussion
4.3 - Next steps
Item 5: DISCUSSION - Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN
Accountability - CCWG Accountability (15 mins)
In discussions around the IANA stewardship transition, the broader topic of the
impact on ICANN's accountability was raised, given ICANN's historical
contractual relationship with the United States government. The community
concerns indicated that existing ICANN accountability mechanisms do not yet
meet some stakeholders' expectations. Considering that the US Government
(through the NTIA) has stressed that it expects community consensus on the
transition, this gap between the current situation and stakeholder expectations
needed to be addressed. This has been done through the formation and
development of a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN
Accountability - CCWG Accountability.
The CCWG-Accountability developed two work streams, of which Work Stream 1 is
intended to align with the timing of the CWG-Transition work and the overall
NTIA objectives and timeline. Initial proposals for Work Stream 1 were
published<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-2015-05-04-en>
for public comment on 4 May 2015 (closing on 3 June). As the GNSO is a
chartering organization of the
CCWG-Accountability<https://community.icann.org/x/ogDxAg>, having adopted the
charter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/enhancing-accountability-charter-03nov14-en.pdf>
in November 2014, this is an opportunity for the Council to review and discuss
the CCWG's work and to discuss what, if any, issues will need to be addressed
by the GNSO or Council at this critical stage.
5.1 - Status summary (Thomas Rickert)
5.2 - Discussion
5.3 - Next steps
Item 6: UPDATE - Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance (10 mins)
The
charter<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52888213/Charter%20ccWG%20IG%202014%20v05.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1423208903000&api=v2>
for this CWG was ratified between September 2014 and April 2015 by the ALAC,
ccNSO and GNSO, having previously been an informal effort organized by the ALAC
and the GNSO's Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group. The GNSO Council does not
currently have a Council liaison to the CWG. Separately, the CWG has submitted
a recent request to its Chartering Organizations to confirm interpretation of
the chartered role of observers/participants in its work. Here the Council will
receive an update on the CWG's progress, discuss both the liaison issue, and
consider a non-objection to the CWG's proposed interpretation of the Charter.
6.1 - Status summary (Oliver Crepin-Leblond & Rafik Dammak)
6.2 - Consideration of non-objection to Charter interpretation
6.3 - Appointment of Council liaison
6.4 - General discussion and next steps
Item 7: UPDATE - Progress of Cross-Community Working Group on Use of Country &
Territory Names as TLDs (10 mins)
This CWG was jointly
chartered<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48347158/Cross--%25E2%2580%2590Community%20WG%20Framework%20for%20Use%20of%20Country%20and%20Territory%20Names%20as%20TLDs%20%2528UCTN%20WG%2529%20Charter.pdf?version=2&modificationDate=1405410806000&api=v2>
by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils in June 2014 to review the current status of
representations of country and territory names under current ICANN policies,
guidelines and procedures, and to provide advice regarding the feasibility of
developing a consistent and uniform definitional framework that could be
applicable across the respective SO/ACs. Here the Council will receive an
update from the CWG co-chairs, and discuss the appointment of a new Council
liaison to the CWG.
7.1 -
Status<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/presentation-cwg-uctn-council-21may15-en.pptx>
summary (Heather Forrest & Carlos Raul Gutierrez)
7.2 - Discussion
7.3 - Next steps
Item 8: UPDATE - Progress of New gTLDs Subsequent Rounds Discussion Group (10
mins)
This Discussion Group was
created<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406> by the GNSO
Council in June 2014 to discuss experiences gained during the current expansion
round of new gTLDs, and identify possible subjects for future Issue Reports
that might result in changes to application procedures. Here the Council will
receive an update on the status of the DG's work, with a view toward possible
Council action on its recommendations in Buenos Aires.
8.1 - Status summary (Bret Fausett / Jeff Neuman / Liz Williams)
8.2 - Discussion
8.3 - Next steps
Item 9: UPDATE - Progress of Cross Community Working Group on Framework of
Principles for Future Cross Community Working Groups (10 mins)
The CWG-Principles was jointly
chartered<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/30345126/Final%20Approved%20CWG%20Charter%20March%202014.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1397487121000&api=v2>
by the ccNSO and GNSO Councils in March 2014, to build on earlier community
work and develop a guiding framework for the initiation, formation, operation
and closure of future CWGs. Since the group began its work, the ICANN community
has relied ever more on CWGs to address issues of substance across various
ICANN SO and ACs. Here the Council will receive an update on the status of work
and proposed timelines of this CWG.
9.1 - Status summary (Steve Chan)
9.2 - Discussion
9.3 - Next steps
Item 10: UPDATE - GNSO Drafting Team on New ICANN Meeting Strategy (10 mins)
Following initial Council discussions on planning GNSO-related meetings at
ICANN Public Meetings after implementation of the new ICANN meeting strategy, a
Drafting Team comprised of several Council members was created to develop an
initial proposal [INSERT LINK] for Council consideration. Here the Council will
receive an update on the status of the project, and consider next steps.
10.1 - Update (Volker Greimann / Marika Konings)
10.2 - Discussion
10.3 - Next steps
Item 11: UPDATE - Progress on GNSO Review (10 minutes)
The Independent Examiner appointed by the Board's Structural Improvements
Committee to conduct the GNSO Review has shared its draft Initial Report with
the GNSO's Working Party on this topic. The current intention is to publish the
Initial Report for public comment following feedback from the Working Party,
prior to the Buenos Aires meeting. Here the Council will receive an update on
the Initial Report and proposed timelines for completing the Review.
11.1 - Update (Jennifer Wolfe)
11.2 - Discussion
11.3 - Next steps
Item 12: Any Other Business (5 mins)
12.1 - Buenos Aires meeting planning (update: David Cake / Jonathan Robinson)
12.2 - Any other business
_____________________________
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3)
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority
of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures
4.4<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>)
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In
exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become
available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 15:00
Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA
(PDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>)
UTC-7+1DST 08:00
San José, Costa Rica UTC-5+1DST 10:00
Iowa City, USA (CDT<http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%E2%88%9206:00>) UTC-5+1DST
10:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-4+1DST 11:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+0DST 12:00
Montevideo, Uruguay
(UYST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html>)
UTC-3+0DST 12:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina
(ART<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/art.html>)
UTC-3+0DST 12:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 16:00
Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 17:00
Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2+0DST 17:00
Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+3+0DST 18:00
Ramat Hasharon,
Israel(IDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.html>)
UTC+3+0DST 18:00
Perth, Australia
(WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>)
UTC+8+1DST 23:00
Sydney/Hobart, Australia (AEDT) UTC+11+1DST 01:00 next day
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2015, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with
exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
http://tinyurl.com/nktk6rh
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|