RE: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines

[Donna Austin <Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jonathan

I'm checking internally, I'll get back to you tomorrow.

Thanks,

Donna

[Description: Description: Description: ARI Logo]DONNA AUSTIN
Policy and Industry Affairs Manager

ARI REGISTRY SERVICES
Melbourne | Los Angeles
P  +1 310 890 9655
P  +61 3 9866 3710
E  donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:donna.austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
W  www.ariservices.com<http://www.ariservices.com/>

Follow us on Twitter<https://twitter.com/ARIservices>

The information contained in this communication is intended for the named 
recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged 
and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must 
not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have 
received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system 
and notify us immediately.

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 7:37 AM
To: 'Edmon Chung'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Ching Chiao'; 'Ram Mohan'
Subject: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines

Many thanks Edmon,

Any other takers?

Jonathan

From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 06 January 2015 10:13
To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'Ching Chiao'; 'Ram Mohan'
Subject: RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines

Hi Jonathan,

Thanks for forwarding this.

The key response or thought I have on this is that the GNSO must be represented 
in the working committee that will be updating the IDN Guidelines.

On this, I am more than happy to volunteer myself and participate in the work.

In general, I think this will be a much needed update so should be welcomed.  
In fact, part of the outputs from the JIG have direct input and have suggested 
updates to the IDN Guidelines.  At the same time, because it is a document 
directly related to gTLD policies (I am not sure if the p is small or capital 
at this point until new draft is being put forward), caution must be taken to 
consider contractual conditions.

Edmon



From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 5:33 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ching Chiao; Ram Mohan
Subject: RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines

Councillors,

A reminder that this letter (re-attached) seeks initial input by 30 January 
2014.

Is anyone willing to pick this up and assist please?

Thank-you.


Jonathan

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 December 2014 10:10
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GNSO 
(council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
Subject: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines

All,

Please see attached and note that the request seeks some initial input by 30 
January 2015.

Thanks.


Jonathan

From: Akram Atallah [mailto:akram.atallah@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 December 2014 00:24
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
Jonathan Robinson
Cc: Mary Wong; Cyrus Namazi; Sarmad Hussain; 
bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Marika 
Konings
Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines

Dear Jonathan,

In the ICANN 50 meeting, the GNSO council and members met with the Board 
Variant Working Group (BV-WG) and suggested to update the IDN Implementation 
Guidelines, the last revision was in 2011.

Based on follow up discussions, during the ICANN 51 meeting the BV-WG directed 
the staff to reach out to the GNSO and ccNSO to collect an initial list of 
issues which should be addressed if this update is undertaken.  This request is 
outlined in the attached letter.

Thank you for your support in this matter.


--
Best,
Akram