ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines

  • To: "'Edmon Chung'" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines
  • From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 15:37:21 -0000
  • Cc: "'Ching Chiao'" <chiao@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Ram Mohan'" <rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <06e101d02999$70d1ff10$5275fd30$@registry.asia>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Organization: Afilias
  • References: <D0A4E97E.1A07F%akram.atallah@icann.org> <00a301d02993$c8ea1620$5abe4260$@afilias.info> <06e101d02999$70d1ff10$5275fd30$@registry.asia>
  • Reply-to: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQIvg0oeTWFTJQ1G/XP86h01t/6QrwE4xaHlAmXuVFyb15EOwA==

Many thanks Edmon,

 

Any other takers?

 

Jonathan

 

From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 06 January 2015 10:13
To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Ching Chiao'; 'Ram Mohan'
Subject: RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines

 

Hi Jonathan,

 

Thanks for forwarding this.

 

The key response or thought I have on this is that the GNSO must be
represented in the working committee that will be updating the IDN
Guidelines. 

 

On this, I am more than happy to volunteer myself and participate in the
work.

 

In general, I think this will be a much needed update so should be welcomed.
In fact, part of the outputs from the JIG have direct input and have
suggested updates to the IDN Guidelines.  At the same time, because it is a
document directly related to gTLD policies (I am not sure if the p is small
or capital at this point until new draft is being put forward), caution must
be taken to consider contractual conditions.

 

Edmon

 

 

 

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 5:33 PM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ching Chiao; Ram Mohan
Subject: RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines

 

Councillors,

 

A reminder that this letter (re-attached) seeks initial input by 30 January
2014.

 

Is anyone willing to pick this up and assist please?

 

Thank-you.

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 08 December 2014 10:10
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO (council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines

 

All,

 

Please see attached and note that the request seeks some initial input by 30
January 2015.

 

Thanks.

 

 

Jonathan

 

From: Akram Atallah [mailto:akram.atallah@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 04 December 2014 00:24
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx; Jonathan Robinson
Cc: Mary Wong; Cyrus Namazi; Sarmad Hussain;
bruce.tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Marika Konings
Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines

 

Dear Jonathan,

 

In the ICANN 50 meeting, the GNSO council and members met with the Board
Variant Working Group (BV-WG) and suggested to update the IDN Implementation
Guidelines, the last revision was in 2011.  

 

Based on follow up discussions, during the ICANN 51 meeting the BV-WG
directed the staff to reach out to the GNSO and ccNSO to collect an initial
list of issues which should be addressed if this update is undertaken.  This
request is outlined in the attached letter.

 

Thank you for your support in this matter.

 

 

--

Best,

Akram



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>