<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG
Dear Mary,
Following up on Gabi's question below, unfortunately the process of membership
isn't clear to me, either.
For example, are all Members now appointed to the CWG on Framework of Operating
Principles for Future CWGs? I understood that members had not all been
appointed, and if that's correct, what is the process for appointing new
members? Council motion? Other?
Apologies for perhaps asking a dumb question while I am new to GNSO procedures.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Heather
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Saturday, 8 November 2014 3:08 AM
Cc: GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG
Hello Gabi and all,
FWIW the "minimum of 2/maximum of 5" model for membership in a Cross Community
Working Group (CWG) was also applied to the ongoing CWG that's developing a
Framework of Operating Principles for Future CWGs, co-chaired by Becky Burr
(ccNSO) and John Berard (GNSO).
Cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 8:43 PM
Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG
Hi,
This is the same membership basis that was used for the CWG-Stewardship, a
charter the council already approved. In fact ths cahrter was patterned off of
that with the missions and goals being different, but the modalities being
similar. I do not recall any discussion during the drafting about a larger
representation.
Only the CSG-Internet had the larger membership count, it was the exception
given if long operation as an ad-hoc group without a charter.
Incidentally, the team from the GNSO on this drafting team consisted of:
GNSO:
Avri Doria
Keith Drazek
David Fares
Thomas Rickert (co-chair)
I hope that helps clarify.
avri
On 06-Nov-14 17:41, Gabriela Szlak wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Thanks so much for the hard work on this.
>
> Regarding the charter, I would like to ask a clarifying question on the
> issue of membership of the CCWG.
>
> The charter says:
>
> *"Each of the chartering organizations shall appoint a minimum of 2 and a
> maximum of 5 members to the working group in accordance with their own
> rules and procedures"*
>
> ¿Could we clarify before the next council call what this means?
>
> I recall a long discussion in LA on membership regarding the Charter for
> the CCWG on IG so I would like to be sure we all understand the language,
> as I am not sure I do, and Susan and I need to report to BC members and ask
> for guidance on this topic. There is a huge amount of work to be done on
> this CCWG and we believe that diversity of expertise and viewpoints in
> membership is crucial to achieve to proposed goals.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Gabi
>
>
>
> *Gabriela Szlak *
>
>
> *Skype:* gabrielaszlak
>
> *Twitter: @*GabiSzlak
>
>
> La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
> The information in this e-mail is confidential.
>
>
> 2014-11-03 19:16 GMT-03:00 Avri Doria <mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>
<avri@xxxxxxx><mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>:
>
>>
Hi,
I second the motion.
As a member of the DT, I also applaud the effort and cooperative spirit
of the DT group. We are getting better at starting up these CWG efforts,
and I admit that the time we did it in looks like it may be far shorter
than my predictions.
avri
On 04-Nov-14 05:52, Thomas Rickert wrote:
>>> All,
>>> please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the
adoption of
>>> the charter for the Enhancing Accountability CWG as well as the charter.
>>>
>>> Let me take the opportunity to applaud DT members, ICANN staff and my
co-chair
>>> Mathieu Weill on having produced the attached charter in a very short
time span
>>> in a most collaborative fashion.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|