<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 07:16:18 +0900
- In-reply-to: <3D6E1F70-7B77-48F4-BB1A-6E60E29036FA@anwaelte.de>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <3D6E1F70-7B77-48F4-BB1A-6E60E29036FA@anwaelte.de>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I second the motion.
As a member of the DT, I also applaud the effort and cooperative spirit
of the DT group. We are getting better at starting up these CWG
efforts, and I admit that the time we did it in looks like it may be far
shorter than my predictions.
avri
On 04-Nov-14 05:52, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> All,
> please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the
adoption of
> the charter for the Enhancing Accountability CWG as well as the charter.
>
> Let me take the opportunity to applaud DT members, ICANN staff and my
co-chair
> Mathieu Weill on having produced the attached charter in a very short
time span
> in a most collaborative fashion.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUV/6yAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HjOYH/j+vXtiyf5lp1n0E7LIFunZn
s7q1mPkXx5gIUa4gv0/mTtFba6UKntlJ+gT2g+jEjFsmq55lc1rey90cUGZt3JcF
/9sOCA0BANmaOgPpm9rUhrdaloYZYzoUWihrjlYUdeYT9rPdwSGLY+JAMwhmTeTH
P2tNfCQs9f+TzCtDdaApB6UMSVxxhxrFdvj0JWf41FOPtkd+wXcEJCsvxX0mgPKb
65lNWfr7YRa5t3LHIF/bWmfhobppk2PAeax8eWXFnsPBK6HODbRh6ndX0CWo+y4x
Wk3PtmQFQLLi0/PtG7vg4RgtNTyp+DdSKtpqBYKQk2wP0TXbHWCYUXL0/m3GLVs=
=bxq3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|