ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] motion re charter for the Accountability CWG
  • From: Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:41:34 -0300
  • Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0/XTUE9e8vqp2Klj3oU0GWjg/ETMMCcDonkHgwmc+DY=; b=Ya1wboqrMA6hPLtcjXcsqnPggPj+zshVkNPaGSp8npCXOieoGpH6ukrA0zh6zmrKnV 6B5xrlmAQjSlAhnWpOXUfmbDdmp7d0wDOX8ePM3n0T1kfYP432dMzFY9s4GZBhc875an 7r8Ev8vFHSixrC92JKP4WVYYj+f42V7k2Toz+L0qaCaqlLE9lyMdR+ivZgXWC2Lu3wzM 5W4+yqWhk/Lq7KfLLLjNR/xqVgySuTx4R6YwohHbfQ7KvYrgSRy1s2o4KqWV8HqANOZ+ DYSuDUVQM4h7KI5n/Voxxc2B+KQZyWW6suXQ3JJ281+PbVYIwD2BKmZV+e59oUbHjBeE DUPg==
  • In-reply-to: <5457FEB2.1050201@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <3D6E1F70-7B77-48F4-BB1A-6E60E29036FA@anwaelte.de> <5457FEB2.1050201@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear all,

Thanks so much for the hard work on this.

Regarding the charter, I would like to ask a clarifying question on the
issue of membership of the CCWG.

The charter says:

*"Each of the chartering organizations shall appoint a minimum of 2 and a
maximum of 5 members to the working group in accordance with their own
rules and procedures"*

¿Could we clarify before the next council call what this means?

I recall a long discussion in LA on membership regarding the Charter for
the CCWG on IG so I would like to be sure we all understand the language,
as I am not sure I do, and Susan and I need to report to BC members and ask
for guidance on this topic. There is a huge amount of work to be done on
this CCWG and we believe that  diversity of expertise and viewpoints in
membership is crucial to achieve to proposed goals.

Thanks a lot,
Gabi



*Gabriela Szlak *


*Skype:* gabrielaszlak

*Twitter: @*GabiSzlak


La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
The information in this e-mail is confidential.


2014-11-03 19:16 GMT-03:00 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I second the motion.
>
> As a member of the DT, I  also applaud the effort and cooperative spirit
> of the DT group.  We are getting better at starting up these CWG efforts,
> and I admit that the time we did it in looks like it may be far shorter
> than my predictions.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 04-Nov-14 05:52, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> > All,
> > please find attached for your consideration a motion considering the
> adoption of
> > the charter for the Enhancing Accountability CWG as well as the charter.
> >
> > Let me take the opportunity to applaud DT members, ICANN staff and my
> co-chair
> > Mathieu Weill on having produced the attached charter in a very short
> time span
> > in a most collaborative fashion.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUV/6yAAoJEOo+L8tCe36HjOYH/j+vXtiyf5lp1n0E7LIFunZn
> s7q1mPkXx5gIUa4gv0/mTtFba6UKntlJ+gT2g+jEjFsmq55lc1rey90cUGZt3JcF
> /9sOCA0BANmaOgPpm9rUhrdaloYZYzoUWihrjlYUdeYT9rPdwSGLY+JAMwhmTeTH
> P2tNfCQs9f+TzCtDdaApB6UMSVxxhxrFdvj0JWf41FOPtkd+wXcEJCsvxX0mgPKb
> 65lNWfr7YRa5t3LHIF/bWmfhobppk2PAeax8eWXFnsPBK6HODbRh6ndX0CWo+y4x
> Wk3PtmQFQLLi0/PtG7vg4RgtNTyp+DdSKtpqBYKQk2wP0TXbHWCYUXL0/m3GLVs=
> =bxq3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>