<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Motions for SCI recommendation
ok.
I was fine with Mary's original language and I am fine with her new
language.
I don't think it changes the nature of the motion.
avri
On 05-Nov-14 03:13, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Yes, the link seems to be working on my end now too. Not sure why it didn’t
> earlier.
>
> I’m attaching alternative language to the friendly amendment I proposed
> (thanks to Mary for helping with it). Sort of a friendly amendment to the
> friendly amendment, I guess. I hope Avri and Gabi find it to be agreeable.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 2:14 AM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 02-Nov-14 23:53, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Two things:
>>>
>>> 1. The link to the language the SCI proposed on waiver of the 10-day rule
>>> for
>>> submission of motions doesn’t seem to be working.
>> These seem to work for me. I checked them before sending and just checked
>> them again.
>>
>>> 2. I’m suggesting an amendment to the motion; specifically to “Whereas #3”.
>>> I
>>> believe this to be a friendly amendment, as I’m under the impression it is
>>> consistent with the SCI’s intentions for a recommended change to the
>>> operating
>>> procedures.
>>>
>>> The proposed waiver of the 10-day deadline for submission of a motion in
>>> section
>>> 3.3 of the operating procedures will not apply to the deadline for
>>> resubmitting
>>> motions as outlined in sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4. I believe the distinction
>>> should be made clear in the council motion we will be voting on. When
>>> dealing
>>> with nuances and modifications to process, these subtleties should leave as
>>> little doubt as possible to their meaning to avoid any confusion that will
>>> lead
>>> to the need for further revisions.
>>>
>>> I’ve attached the proposed amendment to this email, and pasted the amended
>>> language below.
>>>
>>>> /"The SCI developed language to be inserted in Section 3.3 (Notice of
>>>> Meetings) of the GNSO Operating Procedures that provide for a waiver of
>>>> the
>>>> prescribed deadline for the submission of anew motion for voting by the
>>>> GNSO
>>>> Council in certain circumstances provided certain specified criteria are
>>>> met.This waiver will not, however, apply to resubmission of a
>>>> motionpursuant
>>>> to the requirements, limitations and exceptionsof resubmitting a motion in
>>>> sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 of the GNSO Operating Procedures."/
>>>
>> Seems a bit complicated and I am not sure it is necessary, but ok.
>>
>> avri
>>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|