Re: [council] Motions for SCI recommendation

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

On 02-Nov-14 23:53, Amr Elsadr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two things:
>
> 1. The link to the language the SCI proposed on waiver of the 10-day rule for 
> submission of motions doesn't seem to be working.

These seem to work for me.  I checked them before sending and just
checked them again.

>
> 2. I'm suggesting an amendment to the motion; specifically to "Whereas #3". I 
> believe this to be a friendly amendment, as I'm under the impression it is 
> consistent with the SCI's intentions for a recommended change to the 
> operating 
> procedures.
>
> The proposed waiver of the 10-day deadline for submission of a motion in 
> section 
> 3.3 of the operating procedures will not apply to the deadline for 
> resubmitting 
> motions as outlined in sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4. I believe the distinction 
> should be made clear in the council motion we will be voting on. When dealing 
> with nuances and modifications to process, these subtleties should leave as 
> little doubt as possible to their meaning to avoid any confusion that will 
> lead 
> to the need for further revisions.
>
> I've attached the proposed amendment to this email, and pasted the amended 
> language below.
>
> > /"The SCI developed language to be inserted in Section 3.3 (Notice of 
> > Meetings) of the GNSO Operating Procedures that provide for a waiver of the 
> > prescribed deadline for the submission of anew motion for voting by the 
> > GNSO 
> > Council in certain circumstances provided certain specified criteria are 
> > met.This waiver will not, however, apply to resubmission of a 
> > motionpursuant 
> > to the requirements, limitations and exceptionsof resubmitting a motion in 
> > sections 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 of the GNSO Operating Procedures."/
>
>

Seems a bit complicated and I am not sure it is necessary, but ok.

avri