Re: [council] The GNSO CG reps

["James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The GAC delegation will be expanded to 5 seats.  The ICG will accept this 
request, but is re-iterating that that this group is not a "representative" 
body, but rather managing the proposal process.

J.


Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 18, 2014, at 10:40 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the update James.
> 
> What is the proposed expansion of GAC reps?
> From 2 to ?
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 18 July 2014 10:01
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] The GNSO CG reps
> 
> 
> Thanks Avri & Ching!
> 
> So far, I am very impressed with the delegations from all communities to
> this group.  I'm also encouraged that there is broad agreement that this
> group should take a 'light touch' on managing the process, and leave the key
> decisions regarding the substance of the proposal to the cross-community
> working group(s).
> 
> Now let's see if our new, expanded GAC delegation agrees with that approach.
> 
> Thank you--
> 
> J.
> __________________________
> James Bladel
> GoDaddy
> jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 5:09 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> In reading through the list of names we have representing us, I think 
>> we have a really strong crew.
>> 
>>> GNSO
>>> 
>>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (CSG)
>>> Milton Mueller (NCSG)
>>> James Bladel (Registrars SG)
>>> Keith Drazek (Registries)
>>> Jon Nevett (Registries)
>> 
>> And while I plan to harass them all the way through the process, I 
>> think we have a group we can trust.
>> 
>> Just saying,
>> 
>> avri
>