<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] The GNSO CG reps
Thanks for the update James.
What is the proposed expansion of GAC reps?
>From 2 to ?
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: James M. Bladel [mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 July 2014 10:01
To: Avri Doria
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] The GNSO CG reps
Thanks Avri & Ching!
So far, I am very impressed with the delegations from all communities to
this group. I'm also encouraged that there is broad agreement that this
group should take a 'light touch' on managing the process, and leave the key
decisions regarding the substance of the proposal to the cross-community
working group(s).
Now let's see if our new, expanded GAC delegation agrees with that approach.
Thank you--
J.
__________________________
James Bladel
GoDaddy
jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 5:09 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In reading through the list of names we have representing us, I think
> we have a really strong crew.
>
>> GNSO
>>
>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (CSG)
>> Milton Mueller (NCSG)
>> James Bladel (Registrars SG)
>> Keith Drazek (Registries)
>> Jon Nevett (Registries)
>
> And while I plan to harass them all the way through the process, I
> think we have a group we can trust.
>
> Just saying,
>
> avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|