ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] The GNSO CG reps

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] The GNSO CG reps
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:00:44 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <53C89D8A.4060509@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <53C89D8A.4060509@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHPoj4ORnFeKhOwzUygJrZZimudgpuliQf7
  • Thread-topic: [council] The GNSO CG reps
Thanks Avri & Ching!

So far, I am very impressed with the delegations from all communities to this 
group.  I'm also encouraged that there is broad agreement that this group 
should take a 'light touch' on managing the process, and leave the key 
decisions regarding the substance of the proposal to the cross-community 
working group(s).

Now let's see if our new, expanded GAC delegation agrees with that approach.

Thank you--

J.
__________________________
James Bladel
GoDaddy
jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx



> On Jul 18, 2014, at 5:09 AM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In reading through the list of names we have representing us, I think we
> have a really strong crew.
> 
>> GNSO
>> 
>> Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (CSG)
>> Milton Mueller (NCSG)
>> James Bladel (Registrars SG)
>> Keith Drazek (Registries)
>> Jon Nevett (Registries)
> 
> And while I plan to harass them all the way through the process, I think
> we have a group we can trust.
> 
> Just saying,
> 
> avri
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>