ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

  • To: "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board
  • From: "Reed, Daniel A" <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:26:18 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <053e01cf863a$f60b8910$e2229b30$@afilias.info>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <053e01cf863a$f60b8910$e2229b30$@afilias.info>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac+FjtnTHlnOtEKtQhGLZqNk9dbTrgA1EowA
  • Thread-topic: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

Transparency on decision processes is what I hear most often with respect to 
the ICANN board (relates to bypassing processes).

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:37 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

All,

Please can you provide input as to the topics your SG and/or Constituency would 
like to see the Council (bearing in mind the role and function of the Council) 
raise and discuss with the ICANN board in our meeting in London.

A couple of ideas:


-          An update on key themes of the work of the Council and associated 
policy work in the GNSO (Keeping this very short)

o   GNSO / GAC CG

o   PDP improvements

o   Other?

-          Effective and appropriate management of policy work in the ICANN 
structures.
A point related to concerns over bypassing policy processes.  Has this 
improved, got worse or stayed the same?

-          A N Other


Jonathan




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>