<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board
- To: "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board
- From: "Reed, Daniel A" <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:26:18 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- In-reply-to: <053e01cf863a$f60b8910$e2229b30$@afilias.info>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <053e01cf863a$f60b8910$e2229b30$@afilias.info>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac+FjtnTHlnOtEKtQhGLZqNk9dbTrgA1EowA
- Thread-topic: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board
Transparency on decision processes is what I hear most often with respect to
the ICANN board (relates to bypassing processes).
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:37 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board
All,
Please can you provide input as to the topics your SG and/or Constituency would
like to see the Council (bearing in mind the role and function of the Council)
raise and discuss with the ICANN board in our meeting in London.
A couple of ideas:
- An update on key themes of the work of the Council and associated
policy work in the GNSO (Keeping this very short)
o GNSO / GAC CG
o PDP improvements
o Other?
- Effective and appropriate management of policy work in the ICANN
structures.
A point related to concerns over bypassing policy processes. Has this
improved, got worse or stayed the same?
- A N Other
Jonathan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|